Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

simpleflying.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

151–160 of 1001 posts

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#151

Post by analogpixel »

I pine for the day when news is this:

- Flight 767 returned to airport after seeing a bluetooth device named "BOMB"

- After asking all passengers multiple times to turn off all devices and not getting the "BOMB" to go away, they flight had to return to the airport where officials were waiting to search the plane.

- This was not intentional, but a product that calls it self "BOMB" https://hellottec.com/product/bomb-portable-bluetooth-speake...

- Passengers on the plane commented of the event as it was going on in this reddit thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedairlines/s/57lugEMhxl

I guess I shouldn't pine, I can just have AI summarize all sources for me, and stop dealing with poor reporting that tries to drag 3 bullet points into multiple pages for the sake of selling ad space.

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#153

Post by basilikum »

lostlogin wrote: post #126
NegativeK wrote: post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are simpler ways to disrupt a flight.

Are there? Setting a device name might be the lowest effort thing I can think of.

Requires you to be on the plane.

Just call the police and say you have a bomb planted on flight XYZ and want 100000$ or you'll detonate it.

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#154

Post by aaron695 »

Insimwytim wrote: post #29
CamelCaseName wrote: post #13

The Reddit thread on this was equal parts amazing and hilarious. Real time insights from not one, but 9, redditors on the flight. Main post: https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedairlines/s/57lugEMhxl All the redditors on board: https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedairlines/s/Fh2KoqG4SY A passenger with a hilariously illtimed username: https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedairlines/s/W86tRI6ZVf

Those new obfuscated links prevent old.reddit to work. Is there a way for you to post proper direct links?

[dead]

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#155

Post by lostlogin »

kennywinker wrote: post #52
hluska wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

No that was because they hate our freedom, not because of decades of occupation and war all over the middle east funded by US taxpayer dollars.

I’d like to see a rebuttal to this comment.

Is the US now safer after the Iran attacks?

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#156

Post by K0balt »

This is a hilariously stupid reaction to a stupidly hilarious decision made by a speaker manufacturer.

And also a new vector for a ransom-attack on the Bluetooth namespace in certain environments via malicious BLE advertising. The worst thing that could have happened here was for someone to take this seriously.

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#157

Post by dghlsakjg »

lostlogin wrote: post #118
richstokes wrote: post #95

Andddd now everyone knows that an arbitrary text string in a device hostname is enough to ground a flight.

The other incident mentioned is worse I think. It wasn’t a potential threat, it was stating an opinion. “a Wi-Fi hotspot named "Free Palestine, F Zionists" prompted the pilot to issue a warning to the cabin, telling the passenger responsible that they had "30 seconds" to remove the name or the FBI would meet the aircraft.”

Given that the Palestinian Liberation Organization has an actual history of multiple hijackings, this makes a slight amount of sense.

Of course, someone planning to hijack a flight would probably never try to do so with WiFi ssid’s, not to mention that hardened cockpit doors and passenger attitudes mean that PLO style hijackings are now impossible.

Of course, telling people to turn off the network name (bomb, Palestine or otherwise) and everything will be fine, is a tacit admission that the whole thing is theater.

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#158

Post by monkeywork »

analogpixel wrote: post #151

I pine for the day when news is this: - Flight 767 returned to airport after seeing a bluetooth device named "BOMB" - After asking all passengers multiple times to turn off all devices and not getting the "BOMB" to go away, they flight had to return to the airport where officials were waiting to search the plane. - This was not intentional, but a product that calls it self "BOMB" https://hellottec.com/product/bomb-po…

I'd love that as well - can we not get LLMs to summerize and give us non-click bait versions of these events.

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#159

Post by thrownthatway »

jeroenhd wrote: post #22
samgranieri wrote: post #9

A 16 year boy apparently named his Bluetooth speaker “bomb” and couldn’t turn it off, as it was probably in checked luggage. Woof.

You can't rename most Bluetooth speakers. "Bomb" was the name the selling brand gave the speaker. By making everyone turn off their Bluetooth, the kid whose speaker had turned on probably couldn't even see the device broadcasting the name. People linked to one by a company made Hellotec but Hama has a similarly named device, and plenty of other speaker manufacturers try to make a pun out of "boombox" by naming their…

When you rename a Bluetooth device from your phone, does that affect the name it broadcasts, or only the label applied in the list of Bluetooth devices in the phone?

I know for certain if you change the setting General > About > Name in an iPhone it changes what everyone sees when they look at their list of available Bluetooth devices.

I assume other Bluetooth devices are the same, no? Otherwise how do you distinguish which one of the three million Bluetooth devices within range is your friends Bluetooth speaker you’re trying to connect to?

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#160

Post by lostlogin »

esseph wrote: post #5
alfiedotwtf wrote: post #2

> "Free Palestine, F Zionists" Does the FBI usually get involved when someone says these words in public in the US?

[flagged]

Give citizens time, one of them might persuade Trump to attack another country, levelling the score.

Greenland isn’t out the danger zone yet.

Post reply on HN