Live data from Hacker News

United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

simpleflying.com

141–150 of 1001 posts

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or going into the baggage claim area with a bag containing an explosive device, then acting like they grabbed the wrong bag and putting it back on the carousel, and then leaving.

As an aside, this is something I've only seen in the US. At least in my country the domestic baggage claim area is not accessible unless from an arriving aircraft. I'm guessing that has more to do with theft though than security.

Do people collect their bags from the baggage claim area and then immediately reboard an aircraft to exit the terminal?

How do the arrivals exist the terminal

Are you not allowed to have a friend who is picking you up assist with baggage claim?

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#142
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was a bomb speaker: https://hellottec.com/product/bomb-portable-bluetooth-speake...

https://ams3.digitaloceanspaces.com/tesancdn/hellottec/2_BH_...

https://web.archive.org/web/20260531033828/https://tesancdn....

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#143
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an aside, this is something I've only seen in the US. At least in my country the domestic baggage claim area is not accessible unless from an arriving aircraft. I'm guessing that has more to do with theft though than security.

No, that's because in the US they're handling the international flights separately. It's also the reason why even when you have a layover, you need to clear customs. Domestic flights in the US are like busses/trains elsewhere. Most people fly without a checked bag

[flagged]

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#144
post #39
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It wasn't a bomb threat: https://hellottec.com/product/bomb-portable-bluetooth-speake...

> This website has been temporarily rate limited

The url conveys the relevant information.

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#145
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Cognitive dissonance can explain a lot. If you don’t think the current regime is genocidal (whatever that even means) then you might get very concerned that anybody who says it is genocidal is a dangerous lunatic or terrorist sympathizer. Even saying something obviously truthful like “there are good people on both sides” becomes a threatening provocation. Hate is a system.

[flagged]

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#146
post #41
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was a bomb speaker: https://hellottec.com/product/bomb-portable-bluetooth-speake...

What kind of company doesn’t want to pay $5 per month for a paid workers plan for their website?

The kind of company that normally is well within the free tier for years until their product is unexpectedly part of a news cycle.

In all likelihood the site being down right now is actually a PR win.

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#147
post #85

What's to prevent terrorists from going through TSA, waiting in the scanning line when everyone is still going through, and then planting a bluetooth device into someone else's bag? I never open my carryon once I have packed it. This reminds me of the SNL sketch where TSA employees had no answer for someone bringing two separate bottles of 3.9 ounces onto the plane. I'm sure Sean Duffy, of Real World and now Sec of T…

If you’re a terrorist, I’m pretty sure you can think of dramatically more consequential things to do than cause a handful of planes to potentially divert. That’s a wildly pointless prank for something that will invariably wind up with you being arrested. Why do that when you could simply attack people waiting in the security line? That would actually cause terror and shut down an entire airport for days.

A saboteur might want to cause disruption without violence against people, and such cases would still likely be labeled terrorism.

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#148
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

3. The level of tech illiteracy combined with airplane security theater is an affront to all thinking people.

4. A normal level of risk aversion in one of the most risk averse industries If airlines ignored every threat that was “probably not” a real threat, they’d ignore all of them. It’s better to inconvenience a few thousand passengers than it is to kill a few hundred.

There was literally no threat.

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#149

> "Free Palestine, F Zionists" Does the FBI usually get involved when someone says these words in public in the US?

[flagged]

> In this context it is something to worry about.

Would you really be worried if someone said or wrote that near you in any context?

Short of them holding a weapon, this is baffling.

HN is generally absolutist when it comes to ‘freedom of speech’, and I don’t agree with having no limits, but in this instance it’s some overly sensitive overreaching BS.

Re: United Airlines 767 returns to Newark after Bluetooth name sparks alert

#150
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why stop at one bag for one flight? > would result in a prison sentence That doesn’t seem like a significant deterrent here.

This is the type of prank you’d see some idiot do to try and get followers on TikTok, not something a terrorist would bother with.

You sure about that?

>> "All that we have to do is to send two mujahidin to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note other than some benefits for their private companies."

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/11/continuing-anxi...

Post reply on HN