Earlier quoted context omitted.
You need to have an Apple developer account. Then you need to submit your app to Apple for review. Then you need to comply with a list of sometimes arbitrary corrections/requirements that they send back (there is a document that specifies what you need to do, but it is not uniformly enforced in my experience). Then, eventually, you can list your app on the app store. It’s not super onerous, but it is much more annoyi…
Exactly this. For example the iOS app failed first time as I accidentally used "Free" in the app name, and the app declared support for UIBackgroundModes but they were "unable to locate any features that require persistent audio". The dictation keyboard switched you to the app, then if you left would keep recording... fairly basic and obvious stuff. I could have either gone back and argued the case, or simply rip it…
Ask HN: What Is the State of App Development in 2026?
71–80 of 91 posts
Re: Ask HN: What Is the State of App Development in 2026?
#72My perspective: I've been supporting and working with Mac and iOS developers since the last century, when Apple moved me from Chicago to be an evangelist at Apple HQ in Cupertino. I know as much as anyone about AI-assisted app development, as the creator/maintainer of the free/open source Axiom ( https://charleswiltgen.github.io/Axiom/ ) for iOS/macOS devs. It's not as dire as you might think. To software developers,…
A lot of modern languages are still source -> IR -> binary
Re: Ask HN: What Is the State of App Development in 2026?
#73I suspect AI is going to result in the bottom falling out of the market for simple apps. React made simple webapps a case of just gluing dependencies together and much more approachable to a generalist developer than the previous generation of web development was. But native apps weren’t affected in the same way. With AI I suspect we’ll see a lot of simple apps, the ones that really aren’t doing much other than CRUD…
Low end stuff is replaced by google translate but we still have people working as translators for high end stuff like books, government, legal
Re: Ask HN: What Is the State of App Development in 2026?
#74Re: Ask HN: What Is the State of App Development in 2026?
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
AI is not an abstraction. I still can’t believe engineers are making this basic, definitional mistake.
If not an abstraction, how would you describe it then?
Re: Ask HN: What Is the State of App Development in 2026?
#76Open, for example, Reddit, and check the SideProject channel. I counted 1 application per 2 minutes! This is huge! And a lot of it is bad quality, because people have no technical and UI/UX skills. They don't know what architecture, MVC, code review, retrospective, technical documentation, target group, performance, hashing of password, and a lot a lot of things really EXISTS.
Even if you make something cool and stable, you just can't popup! And that's the current state. Too much noise!
Re: Ask HN: What Is the State of App Development in 2026?
#77Re: Ask HN: What Is the State of App Development in 2026?
#78Re: Ask HN: What Is the State of App Development in 2026?
#79In fact, throughout my 14 years career in backend development and engineering, I have been eagerly awaiting something -- like the LLMs -- that would envolve the application development.
As I feel that the most tedious and boring part of backend application development is "translating" business logic into technical code—and this happens to be precisely where LLMs excel. This does not means that writing code is invaluable or is no longer necessary; it simply means that this particular task no longer must be performed by humans personally.
I suspect most people would agree that LLMs do not represent the ultimate path to AGI. Given this, why should we fear LLMs rather than embracing them? What exactly are we afraid of? After all, the tasks that LLMs are capable of handling are merely those that are most tedious and dull for humans.
Yet, ultimately, who is it that defines and validates the software application ? The answer remains: humans!
To enable humans to fully exercise their judgment and decision-making capabilities, while entrusting those tedious, monotonous daily tasks to LLMs—is this not precisely the tremendous boon we have been hoping for?
I know this is easier said than done—hard to accept. Yet, developers need a job to earn a living and support their families.
In this day and age, if one focuses exclusively on App development, what exactly do the career prospects look like?
When it comes to the field of App development, I believe that the role and very essence of developers are poised to undergo a radical transformation. We should no longer limit ourselves to merely translating business logic into code; instead, we ought to pursue our niche—specifically, those tasks that rely primarily on judgment and creativity.
Re: Ask HN: What Is the State of App Development in 2026?
#80So a bit different from the other comments. We're a wearable company which of course pairs with an app. We built iOS first because that's what most of our users have, though the team is mostly on Android. We built our logic in Rust, so that compiles cross platform. It's really just the UI layer that is per platform. Though I had initially written our first demo in React-Native, the team wanted to go with native UI. L…
> and the bluetooth libraries across different devices (particularly in Android land) has me concerned. I work on the Android side for a company that develops an external bluetooth device (not a wearable, but similar enough) and the bluetooth library situation has certainly been an issue to be concerned about. Using the default Android bluetooth SDK "raw" is fraught with potential problems, at the very least you need…
After reviewing a bunch of packages, one of our devs decided this was probably the best available. I'll mention the new Nordic, as we are based on nrf chips.