21–30 of 212 posts
Sorry if this sounds naive, but does it make sense to write a codec library in C/ASM considering how well Rust is progressing, especially when, as the author puts it, AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding ?
Sorry if this sounds naive, but does it make sense to write a codec library in C/ASM considering how well Rust is progressing, especially when, as the author puts it, AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding ?
Ok whose idea was ‘Wiener filtering’
It's a semi-common last name.
Sorry if this sounds naive, but does it make sense to write a codec library in C/ASM considering how well Rust is progressing, especially when, as the author puts it, AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding ?
Go ask FFmpeg what they're writing their encoders and decoders in.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does that prove anything? They're claiming that there are patents, but that doesn't mean there are.
Dolby is only the most recent case, Sisvel consorsium actually bills licences per device: Consumer Display Device: EUR 0.32 Consumer Non-Display Device: EUR 0.11 (source here: https://www.sisvel.com/licensing-programmes/audio-and-video-... )
But now with AV2 and Dav2d, that completely breaks. Are we eventually going to get AV3/Dav3d and AV4/Dav4d, which will read like Ave/Daved and Ava/Davad? Seems a bit awkward. Was the idea from the start to have the 1 be the version number, and have it specifically be part of the name?
I thought this was about Dave2D