Dav2d
jbkempf.com
Dav2d
1–10 of 212 posts
Re: Dav2d
#2[flagged]
Re: Dav2d
#3[flagged]
They filed a suit, henceforth making a claim of an issue...... They haven't "proved" anything other then they have lawyers on staff that can file some paperwork until the suit is settled in court...
Re: Dav2d
#4 ... improvements around 25% compared to AV1
AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding
Re: Dav2d
#5'AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding. In practice, that means software running on today’s hardware will struggle to decode AV2 in real time without careful, architecture-specific optimization'
AV1 software decoding is already very intensive so AV2 decoding benchmarks are the next thing that would be really interesting (or mortifying) to see.
Re: Dav2d
#6[flagged]
How does that prove anything?
They're claiming that there are patents, but that doesn't mean there are.
Re: Dav2d
#7Sorry if this sounds naive, but does it make sense to write a codec library in C/ASM considering how well Rust is progressing, especially when, as the author puts it, AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding?
Re: Dav2d
#8I would love to see comparisons with AV1 on very low bitrates.
Re: Dav2d
#9... improvements around 25% compared to AV1 AV2 decoding is roughly five times more complex than AV1 decoding I'm not sure what these two lines mean or if we can compare them, any help?
Smaller files but harder to decode
Re: Dav2d
#10[flagged]
How does that prove anything? They're claiming that there are patents, but that doesn't mean there are.
Dolby is only the most recent case, Sisvel consorsium actually bills licences per device:
Consumer Display Device: EUR 0.32
Consumer Non-Display Device: EUR 0.11
(source here: https://www.sisvel.com/licensing-programmes/audio-and-video-...)