Live data from Hacker News

Testing the WWI concrete ships and WWII concrete barges

thecretefleet.com

1–10 of 16 posts

Re: Testing the WWI concrete ships and WWII concrete barges

#5

You could do that today for cargodrone boats sintering or epoxy glueing beachsand?

Or melt the sand and form it into long strips, fibers, then glue the fibers together in some sort of glass-fiber-epoxy type material. Get the patent done quick because that sounds viable imho.

Re: Testing the WWI concrete ships and WWII concrete barges

#6

You could do that today for cargodrone boats sintering or epoxy glueing beachsand?

Or melt the sand and form it into long strips, fibers, then glue the fibers together in some sort of glass-fiber-epoxy type material. Get the patent done quick because that sounds viable imho.

Glass fiber? Ridiculous, that'll never work.

Re: Testing the WWI concrete ships and WWII concrete barges

#9

Interestingly concrete yachts are a thing. Ferro-cement is the term, but it is just reinforced concrete. You can buy very large yachts for small amounts of money with yachts made this way in the 70s. Insurance can be tricky for no really good reason

>Insurance can be tricky for no really good reason

It is very expensive to prove a ferro hull to be sound, which is a requirement for getting insurance.

Re: Testing the WWI concrete ships and WWII concrete barges

#10

Interestingly concrete yachts are a thing. Ferro-cement is the term, but it is just reinforced concrete. You can buy very large yachts for small amounts of money with yachts made this way in the 70s. Insurance can be tricky for no really good reason

Except the steel armature inside can turn to hidden rust and if you do something and crack the ferro hull they can be a total loss. A lot were home built so finding a quality build is another issue.

There’s a reason insurance won’t touch them.

Post reply on HN