Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup
1–10 of 512 posts
Re: Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup
#2ChatGPT dropped the ball for a while that most devs and technical people went to Claude for a year or more, they still probably have the most normie market share + are at least trying to win back some of that delay in their latest model so it'd be interesting to see
Re: Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup
#3codex gtp-5.5 is far superior to opus 4.7 working on large projects
Re: Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup
#4How much dilution? Who’s getting the value?
Re: Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup
#5codex gtp-5.5 is far superior to opus 4.7 working on large projects
Not everyone is a developer...
Re: Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup
#6Re: Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup
#7codex gtp-5.5 is far superior to opus 4.7 working on large projects
GPT-5.5 is the better programmer but Opus 4.8 remains the better system architect and product designer.
Codex is very "miss the forest for the trees", but is much better at successfully making large changes in large codebases. Claude Code makes more mistakes, but has more taste and a better grasp on idiomatic and elegant software development.
If you can afford to, I recommend juggling both.
Re: Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup
#8Start what?
Re: Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup
#9codex gtp-5.5 is far superior to opus 4.7 working on large projects
In what ways? LM Arena has Opus 4.7 w/ 1567 -/+ 7 vs. 1505 -/+ 10 from GPT-5.5 Codex in code. I'm currently using both.
Admittedly my recent experience tilts Opus now 4.8, but you and others have my interest piqued re: GPT-5.5 Codex so I'm trying that more now.
Re: Anthropic surpasses OpenAI to become most valuable AI startup
#10I never want to hear from developers again that they are not susceptible to marketing. I see meet ups specifically about Claude often.
Modern tupperware party.
A colleague was convinced Claude is better so we played a game. We used the claude code and codex harness and I implemented some prs they needed with gpt5.5 and opus4.7 and asked them to identify which came from which only from the code.
Couldn’t tell.
Edit: i bet 99% of people here, if presented with a test where i gave 5 models but all of the results came from one, would not be able to discern this. Just vibes all the way down.