If you want to stay a scientist, you have to emigrate. The art of continually licking the right asses to keep funding going is not science.
Hasn’t academia always been that way?
WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants
171–180 of 676 posts
Re: WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
They voted for this. In larger numbers than in 2020 and 2016.
What is this "this" you're referring to? Was this on the ballot? Did Trump announce that he would do this? It seems very easy to just blame this on the voter like this.
So I don't know. Assuming the American voter can read and and access to the internet, it's kind of pathetic to imply they couldn't have known
Re: WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants
#173More of the same at this point. If you are politically connected, or stay in an narrow lane of approved work, you get your grant. But if you stray from the politically approved path, or appear disloyal to our First Citizen and the Party, then your grant will be canceled. The remaining supporters of the incumbent party like to claim that they aren't actually doing anything worse than in the past, and if anything they…
Re: WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
A friend in a prestigious European university said that applications were up in basically all fields
Win win for Europe and the USA, both get what they want.
Re: WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants
#175The amount of capability that America is burning is impressive. I suspect that people outside of academia are not as alarmed, since its not part of daily life.
However it matters the same way that a drug discovery today is life saving 10 years down the line, after its gone through all the processes to go to market.
Re: WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants
#176If you want to stay a scientist, you have to emigrate. The art of continually licking the right asses to keep funding going is not science.
Re: WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants
#177Re: WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants
#178If you want to stay a scientist, you have to emigrate. The art of continually licking the right asses to keep funding going is not science.
Emigrate where? And why do you assume that the country you're gonna emigrate to will have the funds necessay to fund the research? US grants are the biggest and most generous in the world. I think the USG spends over $900 Billion every year. Europe spends about 1/10th of that. Other option is China but as a foreigner, you will never get a grant there unless you work for someone else.
Re: WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants
#179Re: WH proposes rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants
#180If you want to stay a scientist, you have to emigrate. The art of continually licking the right asses to keep funding going is not science.
Hasn’t academia always been that way?
I know a lot of hay and media exists about how academia is yadda yadda biased and anti intellectual. But of course a lot of that is cherry picked examples of controversial figures or individual missteps among individual institutions. This is a bit like taking a classroom with one rowdy asshole and then declaring the whole school must use physical violence as discipline from now on.