Live data from Hacker News

Discussion on changing name from PostgreSQL to Postgres

wiki.postgresql.org

1–10 of 14 posts

Re: Discussion on changing name from PostgreSQL to Postgres

#4
post #2

Having gone through a company rename with much less history than the PostgreSQL name, I would say this is a shockingly bad idea.

It's not much of a rename, though. Lots of people call it Postgres anyways. Besides, most people don't know how to pronounce PostgreSQL anyways, whereas Postgres is easily pronounceable.

I think it's a great decision.

Re: Discussion on changing name from PostgreSQL to Postgres

#5
This is not an announcement, and is a misleading HN submission. The history of that page makes it fairly obvious:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Postgres&acti...

The text is almost verbatim since it was written in 2008. The last discussion on this was 2007/2008, as I recall:

http://andyastor.blogspot.com/2007/08/postgresql-or-postgres...

Re: Discussion on changing name from PostgreSQL to Postgres

#9
This is a wiki page created to discuss the steps that would have to be taken should the decision to change the name be taken.

As far as I know, the core team's position is that the product is called PostgreSQL, with Postgres being an acceptable alias.

If you ask me, this comic sums up the issue adequately: http://xkcd.com/747/

Alternatively, if you want to have a few laughs, check this out: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/File:05_-_Gabrielle_Roth_-_p...

Post reply on HN