Live data from Hacker News

Robinhood now lets your AI agents trade stocks

techcrunch.com

21–30 of 192 posts

Re: Robinhood now lets your AI agents trade stocks

#21
post #3

If there was anything missing from the average American’s economic wellbeing, it was the ability to create bespoke financial products to scalably make bets against informed professional traders while they sleep.

Quite ironic. The original Robin Hood took from the rich and gave to the poor. Robinhood, the app, seems to do the exact opposite: it helps the rich get richer at the expense of regular folk.

Re: Robinhood now lets your AI agents trade stocks

#22
post #4

I don’t understand this constant fascination with having language models trade stocks. Language models are very useful tools but not aligned at all with generating alpha.

AI agents for trading, as well as 24/7 trading are no different than offering sports gambling and prediction markets to the masses; it is a vacuum for the fiat of the unsophisticated. The goal is more trading volume to generate more fees, similar story with private equity wanting access to 401ks to unload PE at peak valuations to bag holders. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window

Maybe synergistic with tokenmaxxing. You should be burning more tokens, and you should also be making more trades.

Re: Robinhood now lets your AI agents trade stocks

#25
post #3

If there was anything missing from the average American’s economic wellbeing, it was the ability to create bespoke financial products to scalably make bets against informed professional traders while they sleep.

And the one time an internet meme exploded a stock they literally hid the buy button from their UI. At least they have confetti animations.

Re: Robinhood now lets your AI agents trade stocks

#26
post #3

If there was anything missing from the average American’s economic wellbeing, it was the ability to create bespoke financial products to scalably make bets against informed professional traders while they sleep.

Especially because it will reduce the entropy that constrains the big guys from building a Dutch book (money pump) against the little guy.

I am sure there are some very happy people in the larger firms due to this news.

Re: Robinhood now lets your AI agents trade stocks

#28
post #4

I don’t understand this constant fascination with having language models trade stocks. Language models are very useful tools but not aligned at all with generating alpha.

I use the Interactive Brokers MCP pretty heavily. I don't do any cool automatic fun "trading", but instead I use it to have "pseudo-QQQ".

I didn't like the relatively high fees for QQQ, and I realized that Invesco releases the weights for QQQ for free. I also think Tesla is too overvalued, and I want to avoid the SpaceX IPO. With the Interactive Brokers MCP, I just feed it the CSV of QQQ's weights, tell it to remove and redistribute Tesla, and then I tell it to buy "$1000 of pseudo-QQQ", in the form of raw stocks.

Doing this, I still basically get the same exposure as QQQ, without any fees.

EDIT: Some of the responses here were right; this is a actually a bad idea, at least with the naive way I was describing it. There's a lot more tax stuff that you avoid with ETFs compared to the makeshift thing I'm describing.

Re: Robinhood now lets your AI agents trade stocks

#29

This is wild. I nearly got banned from Robinhood for just running DCA using an unofficial python api. Crazy how times change.

The world where people used LMMs to make deterministic programs that would trade via API is the relatively saner one that ought to have been.

Re: Robinhood now lets your AI agents trade stocks

#30
post #4

I don’t understand this constant fascination with having language models trade stocks. Language models are very useful tools but not aligned at all with generating alpha.

They’re great at generating alpha, just not for these users.

They’re possibly great at generating alpha in highly complex systems that compose LLMs with tabular machine learning and other analytical techniques at a large scale. So yea, certainly not for these users.
Post reply on HN