Live data from Hacker News

Blue Origin's New Glenn blows up during static fire test

twitter.com

351–360 of 588 posts

Re: Blue Origin's New Glenn blows up during static fire test

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>feels very Elon why

Elon is a true genius, up there with Euler and Feynman. So when things don't go perfectly with his initial idea surely it must be a conspiracy to get him down

:D I am starting to understand why his stock is as high as it is.

Musk is a competent manager, amazing bser, but he is not a genius.

edit: Competent manager is not a slight. There are very few competent managers these days.

Re: Blue Origin's New Glenn blows up during static fire test

#352

This is a crushing setback for Blue Origin. I feel for the engineers. They have been the underdogs for so long, but with the recent successful recovery of the New Glenn booster, it finally seemed like they had some bragging rights. Now they're looking at a year minimum before they get back to a regular launch rhythm. The question now is: What went wrong? If they're lucky, it's just a stupid mistake. Maybe an incorrec…

I worked at SpaceX at the time, and I cannot speak for the company, but I can tell you that approximately nobody inside SpaceX took the idea of a sniper seriously. There was a lot of internet talk about it, and it was one of hundreds of avenues that were explored, and ruled out basically as soon as it was explored.

The very interesting part of the liquid oxygen failure (and this was published in the investigative findings) was that the liquid oxygen that became trapped in the fibers was actually cooled and compressed into solid oxygen - you can read some details here: https://www.americaspace.com/2017/01/02/spacex-closes-amos-6...

Re: Blue Origin's New Glenn blows up during static fire test

#354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Elon is a true genius, up there with Euler and Feynman. So when things don't go perfectly with his initial idea surely it must be a conspiracy to get him down

:D I am starting to understand why his stock is as high as it is. Musk is a competent manager, amazing bser, but he is not a genius. edit: Competent manager is not a slight. There are very few competent managers these days.

The people I know who have worked for him would not call him a competent manager

Re: Blue Origin's New Glenn blows up during static fire test

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Forgive my ignorance, but why would China being the next on the moon be such a bad thing? Aren't moon missions mostly just "look what I can do!" sorts of things?

Depends on your point of view. But I imagine some people in the US would not be happy to lose that race. The reason it was a race in the sixties is because they definitely didn't want the Russians to get there first.

So purely so that China doesn't get the bragging rights? I guess I don't see the big deal but I'm sure it's more important than it seems on the surface.

Re: Blue Origin's New Glenn blows up during static fire test

#356
post #344
post #319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100% Bandwagon-ers who parrot media/youtube/socialmedia. Waiting to be told who to hate next.

Or because it was a thing Elon pursued: https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/05/spacex-pushed-sniper-t...

Reading facts about Elon Musk and making reasonable conclusions about him based on those facts is just anti-Elon bias!

The only way to not be biased is to unthinkingly accept everything he says as truth

Re: Blue Origin's New Glenn blows up during static fire test

#357
post #354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

:D I am starting to understand why his stock is as high as it is. Musk is a competent manager, amazing bser, but he is not a genius. edit: Competent manager is not a slight. There are very few competent managers these days.

The people I know who have worked for him would not call him a competent manager

Hmm, you do have a point. What if I asked you to look at him through the lens of the shareholder?

Re: Blue Origin's New Glenn blows up during static fire test

#358

An unfortunate setback but rockets are hard. The fact that the US has multiple extremely active commercial ventures plus a vibrant government programs with launches every few days just highlights har far ahead the US has become in this area of tech. Many people have never seen a rocket launch ever and yet for a big part of the US looking up in the sky and watching the amazing sight of a rocket going through staging i…

Achievements of SpaceX are enormous. But is US actually far ahead? Both China and EU have pretty much the same capabilities for space exploration.

> Both China and EU have pretty much the same capabilities for space exploration.

China maybe soon, but the EU is not close.

Ariane 6 is in no way comparable to either SLS or Starship or New Glenn. It does 10t to low-earth orbit, 4t to lunar-transfer orbit.

Re: Blue Origin's New Glenn blows up during static fire test

#359

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But pretty much everyone thinks Artemis is Starship HLS or bust. Right now it seems like it's Axiom or bust, with their suits. The suits have missed a lot of milestones, and there's not much point in going to the Moon without suits. Latest NASA OIG report put them somewhere in the 2030s at best...

Can always use the existing ISS suits modified for the moon.

The Moon is frankly a totally different environment. Lunar dust is notorious.

Also the ISS suits themselves are being replaced, by Axiom, because they are failing in near-fatal ways periodically.

Re: Blue Origin's New Glenn blows up during static fire test

#360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It reminds me of my younger self when I encountered inexplicable behavior in my own software, “I think I found a bug in Firefox!” … “Oh, nope. I forgot to add an event handler.”

The modern version of "It must be a compiler bug!"

I thought it was cosmic rays which always cause the bitflip when you least expect it.
Post reply on HN