Microsoft data suggests using AI is more expensive than hiring people
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Microsoft data suggests using AI is more expensive than hiring people
#2Nothing factual in this article, only suppositions and possibilities with reference to MSFT getting rid of claude and Doordash CEO comments a week prior, as the title clearly ..suggests.
Re: Microsoft data suggests using AI is more expensive than hiring people
#3Nothing factual in this article, only suppositions and possibilities with reference to MSFT getting rid of claude and Doordash CEO comments a week prior, as the title clearly ..suggests.
It's anti AI though, expect it to be on the front page shortly.
Re: Microsoft data suggests using AI is more expensive than hiring people
#4Re: Microsoft data suggests using AI is more expensive than hiring people
#5Nothing factual in this article, only suppositions and possibilities with reference to MSFT getting rid of claude and Doordash CEO comments a week prior, as the title clearly ..suggests.
[deleted]
Re: Microsoft data suggests using AI is more expensive than hiring people
#6In 1780, once horse power was way more expensive than a real horse. At least, that’s what my intuition data suggests.
Re: Microsoft data suggests using AI is more expensive than hiring people
#7Re: Microsoft data suggests using AI is more expensive than hiring people
#8Hire competent people, give them tokens. The two axes are complementary, not competing.
Re: Microsoft data suggests using AI is more expensive than hiring people
#9[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48238896
You linked the full discussion for Microsoft capping claude, TFA mentions Doordash and suppositions, titles don't match.
Dupe sensors need calibrating.
Re: Microsoft data suggests using AI is more expensive than hiring people
#10The real problem: token overuse triggered the pullback "after internal incentives pushed teams to compete on AI usage." Incentivised to burn money, they burnt too much.