https://github.com/lechmazur/buyout_game 10th out 36.
https://github.com/lechmazur/pact/ 14th out 25.
https://github.com/lechmazur/nyt-connections/ 60th out 81.
https://github.com/lechmazur/debate 16th out of 29.
21–30 of 116 posts
https://github.com/lechmazur/buyout_game 10th out 36.
https://github.com/lechmazur/pact/ 14th out 25.
https://github.com/lechmazur/nyt-connections/ 60th out 81.
https://github.com/lechmazur/debate 16th out of 29.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Haha does it get bonus points for the extra button, or does it fail because html != SVG?
Any bonus points for the color sre immediately subtracted because the "animate wheels" button leaves the wheels stationary and makes the sun rotate.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Haha does it get bonus points for the extra button, or does it fail because html != SVG?
Any bonus points for the color sre immediately subtracted because the "animate wheels" button leaves the wheels stationary and makes the sun rotate.
So basically, Hy3 is the cheapest decent model on OpenRouter, unless you use DeepSeek as the provider for DeepSeek V4 Flash, in which case DeepSeek's insane caching wins out. (And Hy3 is close-ish on the benchmarks.)
You need to use DeepSeek API directly to gain the extra caching benefits. The DeepSeek provider on OpenRouter is only the 5th-cheapest for V4 Flash, so you have to specify DeepSeek provider when calling OpenRouter. But DeepSeek's API discounts on its models only applies if you call DeepSeek directly. So anyone using OpenRouter to call DeepSeek models is actually losing quite a bit of money.
You might have the default settings on your account, which limit Deepseek as a provider. If you disable that feature you see them on openrouter as well (and they serve it at the same cost as their own API).
For the life of me I will never understand the thought process that leads you to say "we don't really know who developed this LLM but I'm going to feed all of my business's data to it"
> I'm going to feed all of my business's data to it Your business data is probably worthless, even considered harmful for the pretrain corpus. Your interactions and decision making process are most valuable parts of the whole business.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you are ok with everything being fed into it being stored forever I guess it’s no problem. I don’t see how you trust them if you don’t know them.
Who is "them" here? The developers and the hosts are not the same.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Haha does it get bonus points for the extra button, or does it fail because html != SVG?
Any bonus points for the color sre immediately subtracted because the "animate wheels" button leaves the wheels stationary and makes the sun rotate.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You need to use DeepSeek API directly to gain the extra caching benefits. The DeepSeek provider on OpenRouter is only the 5th-cheapest for V4 Flash, so you have to specify DeepSeek provider when calling OpenRouter. But DeepSeek's API discounts on its models only applies if you call DeepSeek directly. So anyone using OpenRouter to call DeepSeek models is actually losing quite a bit of money.
> The DeepSeek provider on OpenRouter is only the 5th-cheapest for V4 Flash You might have the default settings on your account, which limit Deepseek as a provider. If you disable that feature you see them on openrouter as well (and they serve it at the same cost as their own API).
However, I just double checked, and OpenRouter's pricing page for Flash v4 with DeepSeek provider shows a cache hit rate of $0.0028, which is the same as on DeepSeek's official API pricing page ($0.0028), so they do seem to be the same price, (assuming DeepSeek is able to pin your specific OpenRouter requests to the same DeepSeek server). OpenRouter adds 5% to that cost, but still it might be cheaper than the other providers.
Also just found out OpenRouter has a new feature "Response Caching" where they can cache identical requests and return them immediately with no billing. The entire request must be identical, though, not just a prefix, and you have to enable this feature. I don't know who would need to send multiple identical requests, but it's better than nothing?