Live data from Hacker News

Google Hates You

sfgate.com

11–20 of 49 posts

Re: Google Hates You

#12
As a reminder the mission of Google is:

>Google’s mission is to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.

Its mission is not to give traffic to websites. If websites are a bad way for users to get information due to endless rambling or obnoxious ads then don't be surprised if that information is made more accessible. It's like if Google Maps didn't have things like business hours hosted within Maps instead of requiring the user to do extra work and find it on the business's website.

Re: Google Hates You

#13
post #5

i guess i don't blame a writer who's job is threatened by this technology to write a piece like this. but the perspective is ultimately one where they are complaining about how it affects them, without regard to the end user. it's the same as toll booth operators complaining about fastpass

As a user I hate google's approach as well, not because of job related reasons, but the functionality keeps changing to no increased value to me. I don't see how you the end user would have a different opinion unless you did not use google before say 2016.

Yes, the churn they bring to products that were complete over a decade ago is ridiculous. So much change for change’s sake (or more likely in pursuit of promotions internally) and so little thought to quality, what makes a product good, and what would make users happy.

Re: Google Hates You

#14
While I sympathise and it's a well written article, writers engaging in SEO and clickbait (as they admitted) to drive traffic are just as responsible for the death of the internet. They're bemoaning the loss of traffic but that traffic may have already been stolen from a more appropriate search result that didn't have a team working on SEO.

Also, the irony isn't lost on me that I had a cookie dialogue fill 80% of the screen and this little snippet:

> Early Google didn’t even have ads; it was so clean and pure.

> Advertisement > Article continues below this ad

They don't just want your eyeballs they want your data. They want to track you and give that data to advertisers.

Like I said I do sympathise and maybe it's a necessary evil, but in my opinion all of these sites are just a less successful side of the same coin.

Re: Google Hates You

#17

As a reminder the mission of Google is: >Google’s mission is to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful. Its mission is not to give traffic to websites. If websites are a bad way for users to get information due to endless rambling or obnoxious ads then don't be surprised if that information is made more accessible. It's like if Google Maps didn't have things like business hours…

They didn’t fix that when they were removing “don’t be evil”? Interesting oversight.

Re: Google Hates You

#20
Visiting websites as a human is sooo 2025. We are entering a world where only bots actually fetch primary web content any more. Our gatekeeper overlords will filter, curate, and remix everything for us. This is the next step in the machines taking over.
Post reply on HN