Live data from Hacker News

Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code

claude.com

1–10 of 160 posts

Re: Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code

#2
Interesting to note, not sure if this was known publicly before today's blog post:

Rewriting Bun with dynamic workflows

An example of what dynamic workflows can unlock at scale is the recent rewrite of Bun. Jarred Sumner used dynamic workflows to port Bun from Zig to Rust with 99.8% of the existing test suite passing, roughly 750,000 lines of Rust, and eleven days from first commit to merge. One workflow mapped the right Rust lifetime for every struct field in the Zig codebase. The next wrote every .rs file as a behavior-identical port of its .zig counterpart, hundreds of agents working in parallel with two reviewers on each file. A fix loop then drove the build and test suite until both ran clean. After the port landed, an overnight workflow addressed unnecessary data copies and opened a PR for each for final review. While not yet in production, all of this was handled by dynamic workflows. Jarred will be writing about this more in the future.

Re: Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code

#4
post #2

Interesting to note, not sure if this was known publicly before today's blog post: Rewriting Bun with dynamic workflows An example of what dynamic workflows can unlock at scale is the recent rewrite of Bun. Jarred Sumner used dynamic workflows to port Bun from Zig to Rust with 99.8% of the existing test suite passing, roughly 750,000 lines of Rust, and eleven days from first commit to merge. One workflow mapped the r…

I'm extremely skeptical that dynamic workflows had anything to do with this. I've been able to refactor one of the most complicated parts of our code base with similar results.

Mechanical refactors are relatively straight forward for agents.

Re: Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code

#5
I'm going to be honest, this very much reads like an exciting new way to burn up as many tokens as possible. Large amounts of parallel agents that all have all their work double-checked by multiple other agents, and that keeps running for a longer period of time?

I feel like there are more efficient ways to tackle the issues given.

Re: Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code

#6
Cloudflare just launched a feature with this same name, just this month. Why would Anthropic choose the same exact name?

https://blog.cloudflare.com/dynamic-workflows/

Also isn’t all of this already easy to do on any of the platforms (include Claude before this and OpenAI too).

Re: Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code

#8
post #3

I say this as someone who's found LLMs incredibly beneficial. Is this a way to increase token burn? I thought we covered this with Claude's C compiler. What changed?

My initial reaction was that this is tokenmaxxing disguised as a product.

Re: Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code

#9
It feels like we're far past the point of where having AI do more faster is helpful.

It's telling that they used "rewrite Bun in Rust" as the proof point here. It's cool! But the vast majority of software engineering doesn't start with tens of thousands of tests, where making them pass is the whole job.

In my experience, AI still drifts from what I meant it to do on anything bigger than building a widget. My time is spent suspiciously reviewing output for changes the agent snuck in, or invariants it broke. I talked with a friend recently where the agent broke the test harness badly enough that none of the tests mattered for 3 weeks. They did pass, though, so CI never complained.

There's something at the intersection of context engineering, managing that sloppy pile of markdown plans, and good old fashioning system understanding that's the real bottleneck.

Re: Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code

#10
A few of us from the Claude Code team will be hanging around if anyone has questions! Very excited for this launch -- dynamic workflows have been a game changer for engineering here at Anthropic. Can't wait to hear what you think.
Post reply on HN