Live data from Hacker News

DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode

pcgamer.com

211–220 of 556 posts

Re: DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode

#211
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I can scan the first couple sentences of the AI response, and if that already has the answer then great. But how do make the determination that the answer is good and you should stop reading the page? Vibes?

How do you make it without AI ? Are you parsing through millions of pages yourself ?

The LLM results are presented confidently and succinctly in a way that is designed to tell you “yes” OR, it not applicable, it just mashes together statements (which often leads to a response that contradicts itself one sentence later). That’s not the same as your vetting search results.

Well before Google screwed it all up there used to be some correlation between top hits and what you were looking for. SEO has muddied the waters for many years now and it’s never been truly “merit based” or “objective” or whatever we want to call it, but generally speaking, the first results were the best by default.

Re: DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode

#212
I'm in these stats I think. But mostly because I was trying to do an exact search ("something to search") and discovered that google just ignores it.

There's a local search engine with a motto that translates to something like "Find what you don't know." Google has seemingly adapted "find what you don't want."

Re: DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> because they have fear of missing out on AI That's been my experience too, both with friends and coworkers. It would seem that the negative sentiment around AI is largely an internet phenomenon. I've yet to run into a hardcore "AI skeptic" irl. People seem either neutral, or enthusiastic about it.

Seems the main claims against it center around: 1. Labor replacement 2. AI is actually bad in-and-of-itself. Doesn't work, not useulf etc. 3. Energy concerns

I've also seen water usage concerns.

Re: DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kind of. They dominate ads because the dominated search when they bought the successful ads company. By that point in time, they already had your profile built, and the further use of search just continues to enhance that profile. But now that ads has its own persistent tracking that dependence on search is not as strong as it used to be

> when they bought the successful ads company Could you elaborate on this? What ad company did Google buy?

DoubleClick (2008, according to Wikipedia)

Re: DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode

#217
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why let a cooking website get visitors and ad revenue when they are free to take the content and show it as their own? I think this is a step beyond that - why should people be creating cooking websites when you can ask LLM how to cook given thing, while indeed, serving their own ads. It's the continuation of "we own content other people produce" policy

You can also tell the LLM exactly what you have in the fridge or what allergies you have and get customized recipes. It’s just a better experience, 2026 is rough for a recipe site.

Would you trust the tool that recommended putting glue on pizza to give you a good recipe?

Re: DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode

#220
post #20

I truly don't get Google's move. I'm sure the model is fine, but it's not Google Search, and when I want Search I want Search. If I wanted to ask an AI, why can't I ask the one from my subscription... that I'm already paying for... that's actually good... that can also search the web? I assume it's a play to test the waters for how the ad market is going to work, because as a product I really can't see why I would ev…

[dead]
Post reply on HN