Earlier quoted context omitted.
> So if you wanna fix or ban PE, solve pensions. We solved pensions. People have defined-contribution plans now. I would expect insurance float to dwarf pensions as a source of PE funding. The real reason PE exists is because it charges high fees. The financial industry does not make products to serve customer needs, though by happy accident that sometimes happens. It makes products to charge fees. Index funds remove…
Huh? Don’t many jobs still have gold plated pensions? Like millions upon millions? They need to be paid out somehow.
Private equity bought America's essential services
411–420 of 584 posts
Re: Private equity bought America's essential services
#412The irony is that PEs exist largely because of pension funds. So to sum it up (not so nicely) we are transferring value from our current standard of living to pay for retirement checks for our old folks. Pensions fund a significant part of PE and they do so because they need around a 7% return in order to look solvent. If they do not have the higher PE returns, they basically go out if cash in 10 years and everyone w…
There are also many benefits you don’t notice because they don’t bother you
Re: Private equity bought America's essential services
#413Not all PE problems are existential; they will be outcompeted. What keeps a newly graduated Veterinarian from opening her own clinic and undercutting the PE competition? With no massive loans on her books, she can profitably offer lower prices than PE can. She may even drive the local PE clinic out of business.
How is a new graduate supposed to start a business without a loan?
Re: Private equity bought America's essential services
#414Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've never heard of the tie between PE and pensions until today. I find it very hard to believe that if pensions didn't exist, nobody would have come along and exploited the same loopholes.
I've been thinking about that comment and I don't think it makes sense. When it comes down to it, PE is really just doing two things: 1. Taking advantage of a pricing inefficiency; and/or 2. Using local monopolies, inelastic demand and regulation to jack up prices. But what powers PE is the LBO (leveraged buyout). That is, you buy csome company with borrowed money and then you borrow against the assets of that compan…
Re: Private equity bought America's essential services
#415Interesting seeing a quote from Sen. Josh Hawley that I agree with... Quote (from article) “This didn’t just happen to you accidentally. This is a business decision, isn’t it? You keep these backlogs like this. […] Another word for this would be a heist. This sounds to me like private equity came in; bought up all of these small companies; combined them; shut down their production; rolled up a huge backlog; massive p…
Re: Private equity bought America's essential services
#416Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't get it. If pensions stopped existing, would people stop doing PE even though it's profitable? If it is possible to get outsized returns "because pensions need them" then isn't somebody gonna notice and get those returns anyway, pensions or not?
Slavery is profitable. People only stopped doing it when it was perceived as immoral. Lots of things are profitable but immoral. People will do crazy immoral and illegal stuff for money, but we outlaw and slander the more abusive stuff, like monopolies and such. If it wasn't pensions that were funding PE, I'm sure PEs would get a lot more criticism and would not be allowed to do what they do.
Slavery is bad economics. If you want your economy to grow, paying workers is not bad. Economic growth isn't zero sum.
Re: Private equity bought America's essential services
#417Re: Private equity bought America's essential services
#418Earlier quoted context omitted.
The pre 1980s standards were ridiculous though. However, even if the US moves to some 3 quarters of the way towards now would be a huge improvement. The "consumer harm" standard is idiotic.
I don’t see how they were ridiculous on the face it. The economy during that regulatory period grew into a huge juggernaut. Most of the R&D that laid the future of the world happened during that period. The middle class grew to its largest portion during that period. I don’t think the economy was hamstrung in the least
The classic example is airline deregulation which happened under Carter. The real cost of flights is way, way down since then. But this doesn't stop people from complaining about how "flying is a worse experience now" and wishing for a return to inane regulations.
Re: Private equity bought America's essential services
#419PE profits sound like other companies opportunities. Unless there are barriers to entry not covered in this article, I would think other companies could move in, deliver a fire truck faster and at a lower cost, and at least take a portion of the market that is able to switch.
Re: Private equity bought America's essential services
#420Earlier quoted context omitted.
The pre 1980s standards were ridiculous though. However, even if the US moves to some 3 quarters of the way towards now would be a huge improvement. The "consumer harm" standard is idiotic.
Would you share a more detailed argument? Right now we only have adjectives: "ridiculous", "idiotic". The US economy generally did very well with those standards, maybe the best it ever did, especially considering distribution of benefits.
Spurious correlation. Few experts (economists) think old regulations caused economic growth.
If we really want to recreate post-war growth, we should destroy half our infastructure and fight a world war. Then, in the years following the end of that war, we can experience catch-up growth.