I agree that it is almost suspicious how quickly it has risen to prominence. There has been a surge of hugely popular amorphous open source projects by single or few maintainers, often created very recently. In my experience, most of the users of Omarchy are inexperienced with Linux, and use it because it doesn't require them to form their own opinions and workflows, which can be both positive and negative.
Omarchy Is Not A Distro
11–20 of 186 posts
Re: Omarchy Is Not A Distro
#12Linux should be hard and shitty and it should break all the time! What is this newfound obsession with distros that just works and have some great setups and defaults.
Where do we end up if you can just close your laptop lid or copy paste with the same key or or or if even… gasp… the theme is automatically applied across all apps?
DHH? More like literal devil.
No sir! Let me write a blogpost post haste!
Re: Omarchy Is Not A Distro
#13There aren’t really any rules to what to find this or not. Just because something is more opinionated than other solutions doesn’t mean it’s invalid.
In fact, I would say that that’s the primary reason people gravitate towards Omarchy. Many developers coming from the competing operating systems want stuff that just works out of the box, including proprietary software!
If you don’t like it, just ignore it and move on. I thought we were past this “I dislike this thing on the internet therefore everyone who likes it is wrong” phase of the internet. It’s also discourse like this that specifically discourages people from trying Linux.
Re: Omarchy Is Not A Distro
#14Re: Omarchy Is Not A Distro
#15Omarchy!! shipping a window manager with defaults and or a terminal with a config - what an unspeakable sin. Linux should be hard and shitty and it should break all the time! What is this newfound obsession with distros that just works and have some great setups and defaults. Where do we end up if you can just close your laptop lid or copy paste with the same key or or or if even… gasp… the theme is automatically app…
Yeah! What a mystery. What could make people install omarchy or pop os over debian, arch or gentoo?
What could possibly be the reason
Re: Omarchy Is Not A Distro
#16FWIW, 1Password is pretty great.
Re: Omarchy Is Not A Distro
#17Omarchy!! shipping a window manager with defaults and or a terminal with a config - what an unspeakable sin. Linux should be hard and shitty and it should break all the time! What is this newfound obsession with distros that just works and have some great setups and defaults. Where do we end up if you can just close your laptop lid or copy paste with the same key or or or if even… gasp… the theme is automatically app…
Re: Omarchy Is Not A Distro
#18The more interesting question is, do people actually want a hyper-opinionated Linux install? Based on the reactions to Omarchy that I've seen, the answer is obviously yes. Broadly, people seem ok with just not using some of the suggested software if the defaults get them most of the way there.
More generally, I would say that configuring one's own Linux installation is not in itself virtuous. It used to be a way to identify people who were "committed" to using it via gatekeeping. The OP says that Omarchy is just DHH "cashing in" on new inexperienced Linux users, but as long as we don't value customizing one's own installation just for the sake of customization (I certainly don't anymore!), why is this a problem?
Re: Omarchy Is Not A Distro
#19It is understandable to be frustrated at a project without technical merit gaining so much traction when, as in the author's words, "longstanding distros like Debian have struggled with funding and sponsorship for decades". However, I do feel the author fails to come up with any conclusion as to why there is such a disparity between interest in traditional distributions and this rice. I agree that it is almost suspic…
Omarchy was my first entry back into desktop Linux since the early 2000s, when I ran enlightenment. The promises of Omarchy are big, and the idea of somebody trying all the tons of available bits of desktop Linux and assembling their favorites is very compelling!
I've since moved to KDE Plasma on that initial Omarchy install, but kept some other parts like the Bash completion system. I would love to get back to having single key sequences to bring up, say, a Claude window, but not enough to set it up in Plasma. If somebody else did it for me though... that's the appeal of Omarchy.
Re: Omarchy Is Not A Distro
#20What a strange thing to publish.. just don't use it if you don't like it? What is this even attempting to do?
the poster seems to have skipped over the point that "Omarchy" is just the default configuration of Arch for 37signals internal use, and enthusiasm over it working well caught on, so it's shared as open source.
CachyOS is another set of UI configurations of Arch and is also just handy.
disclaimer: i use both and they work well.