Live data from Hacker News

Ebola Outbreak Now Third Largest Recorded and "Spreading Rapidly"

arstechnica.com

1–10 of 133 posts

Re: Ebola Outbreak Now Third Largest Recorded and "Spreading Rapidly"

#3

This unfortunately won’t be news again until, and I think this is now an until versus if, we find evidence the disease is spreading uncontrollably outside the DRC.

I think that’s going to be true if any disease whose previous outbreaks were only in a “third world” place. The rest of the world easily ignores it. If it was contained but in let’s say - some European country - I bet it would be in the news 24/7 still.

Re: Ebola Outbreak Now Third Largest Recorded and "Spreading Rapidly"

#4

This unfortunately won’t be news again until, and I think this is now an until versus if, we find evidence the disease is spreading uncontrollably outside the DRC.

I think that’s going to be true if any disease whose previous outbreaks were only in a “third world” place. The rest of the world easily ignores it. If it was contained but in let’s say - some European country - I bet it would be in the news 24/7 still.

You think an outbreak, in for example Belgium, would be 24/7 news in Demorcatic Republic of Congo?

Re: Ebola Outbreak Now Third Largest Recorded and "Spreading Rapidly"

#6
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that’s going to be true if any disease whose previous outbreaks were only in a “third world” place. The rest of the world easily ignores it. If it was contained but in let’s say - some European country - I bet it would be in the news 24/7 still.

You think an outbreak, in for example Belgium, would be 24/7 news in Demorcatic Republic of Congo?

The DRC is a former Belgian colony, so yes.

Re: Ebola Outbreak Now Third Largest Recorded and "Spreading Rapidly"

#9

This unfortunately won’t be news again until, and I think this is now an until versus if, we find evidence the disease is spreading uncontrollably outside the DRC.

I think that’s going to be true if any disease whose previous outbreaks were only in a “third world” place. The rest of the world easily ignores it. If it was contained but in let’s say - some European country - I bet it would be in the news 24/7 still.

If that outbreak was in a midsize European town like Marburg they would even name the virus after it.

Re: Ebola Outbreak Now Third Largest Recorded and "Spreading Rapidly"

#10
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think that’s going to be true if any disease whose previous outbreaks were only in a “third world” place. The rest of the world easily ignores it. If it was contained but in let’s say - some European country - I bet it would be in the news 24/7 still.

You think an outbreak, in for example Belgium, would be 24/7 news in Demorcatic Republic of Congo?

This is such a weirdly tilted and aggressive response, complete with Facebook style demand to prove some strawman nobody ever claimed.

Yes, outbreaks of extremely contagious and deadly disease often are major news stories in other countries, and yes western nations often ignore outbreaks in global south nations.

Post reply on HN