For people that can't grok the title and the article like me: - BasedApparel.com is a website owned by a person that happens to be the FBI director now. (he owned it before he became the director if it matters) - The website BasedApparel.com was hacked and the hackers added a malicious click here to verify you are human section that tried to have you download a malicious payload if you were on macos.
FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
31–40 of 66 posts
Re: FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not both?
To what point? Do we actually think Trump would use a Trump phone? Otherwise, they'd just be getting data on die hard MAGA types that have nothing to do with anything juicy
Re: FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
#33Oh, I also got one: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Special:CreateAcc... > To protect the wiki against automated account creation, we kindly ask you to answer the question that appears below (more info): What is the output of: LC_ALL=C pacman -V|sed -r "s#[0-9]+#$(date -u +%m)#g"|base32|head -1 Wait, they really do that...
If you can't understand that command before pasting it in your terminal, then you probably shouldn't be editing the Arch Linux wiki.
Re: FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
#34I don’t think it’s unfair to blame cowardice and venality of individual Republican politicians in the face of being primaried, although it definitely needs an asterisk that we don’t know that the left’s Senators and Congressmen would do any better under the same situation.
Re: FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
#35Re: FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
> he owned it before he became the director if it matters All the more reason that those who "serve" in the government should be required to divest of their business interests. The traffic such a site would get due to the tribalism prevalent in US politics makes it a fat target, and potentially a national security threat.
Im a big fan of divesting in these scenarios but i dont know how that would help in this scenario specifically. His current role and his previous ownership made the site a target, but it would be a target regardless of who owns it currently.
> it would be a target regardless of who owns it currently.
The commonality of attacks makes it more important to eliminate distracting dependencies for critical leaders. Not less.
There is a reason top security clearances have requirements no normal organization could make on their employers. Lack of loose vectors is even more important for leaders.
Re: FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
#37> The attack seems to work by spanning various instructions that if run through macOS’s Terminal utility could steal stored credentials from Chromium-based browsers along with data from cryptocurrency wallets, placing them into a zip archive then sent to a hacker-controlled domain. What is it about Chromium based browsers that this attack narrows down to? Is it something technical in the ease of stealing information…
Re: FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
#38Oh, I also got one: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Special:CreateAcc... > To protect the wiki against automated account creation, we kindly ask you to answer the question that appears below (more info): What is the output of: LC_ALL=C pacman -V|sed -r "s#[0-9]+#$(date -u +%m)#g"|base32|head -1 Wait, they really do that...
If you can't understand that command before pasting it in your terminal, then you probably shouldn't be editing the Arch Linux wiki.
Re: FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
#39Re: FBI director's Based Apparel site has been spotted hosting a 'ClickFix' attack
#40Would this be a news if it was not owned by FBI director? Do we really expect the FBI director to be responsible for this? He probably outsourced it to some company. This is an inflammatory headline.
we do (and absolutely should) have higher expectations of the head of one of the most powerful organizations in the world. said organization that goes after malicious actors makes it even more newsworthy.