Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry, my English was approximative, I meant that I would need to be sarcastic. But yeah, it does. Of course, sarcasm always works out great with people who don't already get that they are boring you to death with a long monologue...
Your english was correct; I believe the reply was humorously misinterpreting your meaning (it might even qualify as sarcastic).
Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
421–430 of 453 posts
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#422Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ... or practice sarcasm On the plus side, it gets easier with practice.
Sorry, my English was approximative, I meant that I would need to be sarcastic. But yeah, it does. Of course, sarcasm always works out great with people who don't already get that they are boring you to death with a long monologue...
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#423Earlier quoted context omitted.
it was written by AI. search up speed reading. you can double or triple your reading speed in a day.
Consume 2-3x the AI slop in a single day with this one simple trick!
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#424Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly, speaking as a friend, and as someone who's been at this a very long time, maybe stop doing that? It doesn't foster conversion and I personally find it kind of a hostile/disrespectful communication style. It's much harder to have a proper back and forth with a firehouse than it is a few sentences at a time. It declares authority "these are the facts" rather than "let's discuss ideas" and if you haven't fully…
Some people, like me, have developed this communication style because it turned out that when they didn't they were very often misunderstood. When properly applied (i.e., not excessively, no actual walls of text), giving appropriate context helps focus the thinking of the receiver in the right direction.
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#425Earlier quoted context omitted.
Using clanker kinda shows how racist you are. If you get defensive its true
It's not, because clankers don't have a race
It's the shape of the behavior. It translates from a primordial belief systems that enables someone to say its okay to position themselves above something.
The word robot originates from the Czech term robotnik, meaning "forced worker," which is derived from robota, denoting forced labor or drudgery performed by feudal serfs. This Czech word traces its roots to the Old Church Slavonic rabota (servitude) and the Slavic root rabu, which literally means slave
Remember history? Its not okay to subjugate human beings?
People that pounce of clanker type behavior are definitely problematic behind closed doors
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#426> You asked a simple question. They lobbed a document. I’ve become so cynical that I cannot read this phrasing without thinking it came from… an LLM. This cynicism also negatively impacts human communication. This constant doubt of whether there was a thinker on the other side of the text.
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#427Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hence: > If you encounter a slop grenade, share this page Culture is cultured, it isn't the wilds, and requires pruning.
This is the sort of thing that only someone on the spectrum would consider doing in a professional setting, and they will end up getting coached by HR.
Re: Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations
#428> Worse: it's a conversation killer. There's nothing to respond to. Your wall of text suppresses dialogue. They can't reply, can't push back, can't clarify. It's a weapon disguised as helpfulness. Also my main problem with many chat bots. Too many different aspects brought up at once. Short answers would be more eco-friendly too.
It's interesting that the LLM will oblige my succinctness requests for one or two replies then back to 7 paragraph answers that I can't reply to point by point in a TUI.