People need to cope with the fact that no thought is original. Even Newton and Leibniz were having the same thoughts at the same time. Get over it.
Why post comments then?
AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
141–150 of 783 posts
Re: AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
#142Re: AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
#143IP attorney here and actively working on this problem. nla: if you create content online (public repo code, blog, podcast, YouTube, publishing) the smartest thing you can do if to file a US copyright, even if you have a hobby blog. Anthropic paid $1.5B in a class settlement to authors because it was piracy of copyrighted works. If we as a HN community had our works protected, there are potentially huge statutory dama…
Doesn't the mere act of publishing your original content online grant you copyright?
Re: AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
#144Re: AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
#145100% creators should get compensated by ai platforms for their work.
Further, I can see a day where someone like Reddit will close off or license their data to llms. No doubt they are losing traffic right now.
Re: AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
#146Re: AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
#147Re: AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale
#148The broader problem of original sources not being given credit in a way that rewards them remains. Websites owners are paying to host their content so that spiders can come and crawl them and index it into the AI and then if they’re lucky, they might get a citation, but otherwise there’s very little reward for being a provider of content. And of course, this is something that’s getting worse and worse. Why look at a…
I know this has repercussions on findability, but if that wasn't a concern, I'm curious how one might circumvent getting crawled.