An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
21–30 of 1001 posts
Re: An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
#22- It does not show an example of the new best solution, nor explain why they couldn't show an example (e.g. if the proof was not constructive)
- It does not even explain the previous best solution. The diagram of the rescaled unit grid doesn't indicate what the "points" are beyond the normal non-scaled unit grid. I have no idea what to take away from it.
- It's description of the new proof just cites some terms of art with no effort made to actually explain the result.
If this post were not on the OpenAI blog, I would assume it was slop. I understand advanced pure mathematics is complicated, but it is entirely possible to explain complicated topics to non-experts.
Re: An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
#23Re: An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
#24I would have thought a triangular grid works better than a grid of squares. You get ~3n links vs ~2n for the square grid. Curious what the AI came up with.
Re: An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
#25Re: An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
#26How central is it in the discrete geometry? Could anyone with the knowledge in the field reply?
Re: An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
#27Re: An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
#28AI isn't going to supercharge science but I wouldn't be as dismissive as other posters here.
Re: An OpenAI model has disproved a central conjecture in discrete geometry
#29"The proof came from a general-purpose reasoning model, not a system built specifically to solve math problems or this problem in particular, and represents an important milestone for the math and AI communities."