Google really should publish a flow diagram for how they decide to turn off someone's business.
It would just be a control flow graph of rand(3)
Ask HN: Shouldn't Google need to give a public statement about Railway incident?
71–80 of 116 posts
Re: Ask HN: Shouldn't Google need to give a public statement about Railway incident?
#72I can't believe that readers of HN actually think that that is how it does or should work. Google/GCP can only make very general statements and in this case we want more than that. They need to tell Railway and Railway needs to tell us, or Railway can tell us that Google is refusing to tell them. Either way, we need to hear about this from Railway.
They did: "We take full responsibility for the architectural decisions that allowed a single upstream provider action to cascade into a platform-wide outage, and detail below what happened, how we recovered, and the changes we are making to prevent this from happening again." My guess is they will be switching away from Google Cloud. Because anything else would be nuts.
I know hating GCP is hip, but why do only a minority entertains the possibility that Railway did really something off to trigger some alarms?
The calibration of the alarms might be off, and that's acceptable, but in the end if something can be held wrong, somebody will hold it wrong.
I did the same thing in the past, albeit in a much smaller scale. There's no shame in being wrong and admitting as long as it results in progress, so this stance of "we do nothing wrong" from both parties is getting a bit old now.
Re: Ask HN: Shouldn't Google need to give a public statement about Railway incident?
#73Totally agreed the news like this makes me nervous too. For a high profile customer it feels like Google should give a clear explanation of what happened.
> For a high profile customer Are they really "high profile"? I've never heard of them until this incident or maybe the other one with the database. They just seem... Loud, publicly. And always about failure.
In this sort of community, fairly well-known yes.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateEnd=1779148800&dateRange=custom&...
Re: Ask HN: Shouldn't Google need to give a public statement about Railway incident?
#74This is actually scary. If Google can suspend a company like Railway without warning, what chance does a smaller startup have? The lack of any human escalation path at Google Cloud has been a known problem for years. You'd think enterprise customers paying real money would at least get a phone call before getting shut down
Then you should be scared about every single online account you use, since they all have this same capability of suspension of your account. That's inherent in any service policy.
Google seems to be the only one that actually does it, regularly, with no warning or comment, to other people. Google also spreads bans to accounts it deems related, so your personal Google account is likely to be deleted at the same time as your GCP account. That includes your Gmail address and your phone login and cloud storage.
And vice versa. Company accounts have been deleted because an employee's personal account tripped Google's random number generator. Again, only Google does this.
Re: Ask HN: Shouldn't Google need to give a public statement about Railway incident?
#75Related ongoing thread:
Incident Report: May 19, 2026 – GCP Account Suspension - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48204770 - May 2026 (144 comments)
Previously:
Incident Report: Railway Blocked by Google Cloud [resolved] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48201484 - May 2026 (344 comments)
Re: Ask HN: Shouldn't Google need to give a public statement about Railway incident?
#76GCP is basically just a toy. If you're hosting something important there you should probably not do that. It works as a Plan B, but by no means should Google be your Plan A. I don't know what happened in this case, there's a chance it wasn't Google's fault but it doesn't matter, Google already lost all benefit of the doubt long ago.
Shopify is all on GCP and works well.
Re: Ask HN: Shouldn't Google need to give a public statement about Railway incident?
#77No warning, no email, nothing. Just you find out your business is down the same way your users do. Google needs to explain this.
Re: Ask HN: Shouldn't Google need to give a public statement about Railway incident?
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Arbitration is an inefficient and unproductive process. I suppose that may be what the parties chose, but the public will likely never know what happened and the problem will be allowed to reoccur again and again. Things like these are better resolved in courts, with res judicata, precedent, and visibility so that legislators can fix statutes where necessary.
> and the problem will be allowed to reoccur again and again You're already placing blame here. We don't know the details other than what Railway has said.
I think that's true regardless of what happened.
If Railway did something wrong, then letting that be known may help other customers avoid the same ~mistake.
Re: Ask HN: Shouldn't Google need to give a public statement about Railway incident?
#79Would you want your vendors publicly disclosing potentially private reasons for an outage?
If it were google's bug as Railway has certainly at least insinuated, then yes. I would also be fine with them saying "blah blah blah abuse was detected; we're working through it with our customer and we apologize to those impacted."
I'd also expect a story around how it is this happened w/o a human spending at least an hour working his/her way through a call list to reach someone at Railway. Starting with ops and escalating to the ceo if necessary.
Re: Ask HN: Shouldn't Google need to give a public statement about Railway incident?
#80> Railway's GCP account manager engaged directly
This would have been an amazing conversation to witness.