Earlier quoted context omitted.
>The private company would gladly connect everyone. they do plenty of completely arbitrary censorship voluntarily. no government had mandated the frenzied erasure of certain viewpoints during certain events of 2020-2023, for example.
Which viewpoints?
Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE
221–230 of 512 posts
Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE
#222Meta is the worst of the worst. I don't use it other than a tombstone account with some family connections and a separate burner account we use for Facebook marketplace.
Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
What about "Meta blocks human rights accounts for audiences in Saudi Arabia and UAE"? I don't think "reaching" adds much to the headline
> "Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE" 79 chars.
Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE
#224Social media companies post record earnings year after year from their ads business while increasingly proving to be harmful to society. They do the bare minimum in terms of content moderation and bots while priming the algorithms to maximize revenue. The good ol' privatized profits, socialized harm model. In a just world, would social media platforms be taxed higher on corporate revenue and how would that pan out? M…
I’m taking it as a given that any sufficiently large social network is a gigantic propaganda machine of interest to domestic and foreign nation-state actors. Entertaining the thought experiment where all the normies join the fediverse: now you’ve got a big juicy target maintained by hobbyists. When it’s Lazarus Group vs Randall, the over-worked sys admin who stood up a node in his spare time, who do you think wins? S…
I've been pushing for the under-14 ban, which is popular in almost every country with polling, and holy shit is it a pigpen to wade through.
Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE
#225Meta is a scourge.
Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE
#226Well, it's that or the accounts get removed completely. Sometimes you have to pick your fight, and this doesn't look like one that's worth it.
The third option is to ignore them and let them block you . In a democracy this causes lots of public outrage and might be reversed. Not sure how it goes in authoritarian monarchies.
Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE
#227Put social media onto torrent. Make reshares a seed, have it where users can use their device or a remote device to hold the seed.
Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE
#228Do they have a choice? It’s either that or they are shown the door, in which case they will probably be replaced by worse local alternatives in terms of freedom of speech and gov influence
Neither the UAE nor Saudi Arabia have extradition treaties with the United States. (On a practical level, they wouldn't be able to enforce one if they had it.)
Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE
#229Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE
#230Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is the exact opposite of what you think. The problem is the governments in those places, and not the private company. The private company would gladly connect everyone.
The transnational private sector is neither morally consistent nor geopolitically neutral. The transnational private sector is neither morally consistent nor geopolitically neutral. The transnational private sector is neither morally consistent nor geopolitically neutral.
Despite Meta's self serving actions here their morals are significantly better than those of Saudi Arabia or the UAE.