Live data from Hacker News

Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

alqst.org

221–230 of 512 posts

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The private company would gladly connect everyone. they do plenty of completely arbitrary censorship voluntarily. no government had mandated the frenzied erasure of certain viewpoints during certain events of 2020-2023, for example.

Which viewpoints?

The ones that got a million Americans killed

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#222

Meta is the worst of the worst. I don't use it other than a tombstone account with some family connections and a separate burner account we use for Facebook marketplace.

This is how everyone talks about their use of Meta products: "I don't use them except for those times I use them...". We all need to actually boycott and actively help create alternatives or these little bits of fabricated need will keep them in business forever.

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#223
post #96
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about "Meta blocks human rights accounts for audiences in Saudi Arabia and UAE"? I don't think "reaching" adds much to the headline

> "Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE" 79 chars.

Might as well go for the limit and replace the comma with " &" (space ampersand)

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#224
post #102
post #18

Social media companies post record earnings year after year from their ads business while increasingly proving to be harmful to society. They do the bare minimum in terms of content moderation and bots while priming the algorithms to maximize revenue. The good ol' privatized profits, socialized harm model. In a just world, would social media platforms be taxed higher on corporate revenue and how would that pan out? M…

I’m taking it as a given that any sufficiently large social network is a gigantic propaganda machine of interest to domestic and foreign nation-state actors. Entertaining the thought experiment where all the normies join the fediverse: now you’ve got a big juicy target maintained by hobbyists. When it’s Lazarus Group vs Randall, the over-worked sys admin who stood up a node in his spare time, who do you think wins? S…

> Social networks are cancer. Just ban the lot of them and move on

I've been pushing for the under-14 ban, which is popular in almost every country with polling, and holy shit is it a pigpen to wade through.

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#226

Well, it's that or the accounts get removed completely. Sometimes you have to pick your fight, and this doesn't look like one that's worth it.

The third option is to ignore them and let them block you . In a democracy this causes lots of public outrage and might be reversed. Not sure how it goes in authoritarian monarchies.

While we're fantasizing about evil people doing the noble thing: the fourth option is for Meta to takes its vast wealth and help build resilient uncensorable communications instead of doubling down on centralized and surveilled social networks.

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#227
post #210

Put social media onto torrent. Make reshares a seed, have it where users can use their device or a remote device to hold the seed.

This is sort of what Scuttlebutt did. You receive and distribute posts by anyone you follow, creating a decentralized network, not just a federated one. I enjoyed checking it out briefly a few years ago, but there really wasn’t that much to see, and it would randomly cause your computer to run hot and eat up gigs of storage. I also worry about inadvertently storing copies of illegal images on this kind of network.

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#228

Do they have a choice? It’s either that or they are shown the door, in which case they will probably be replaced by worse local alternatives in terms of freedom of speech and gov influence

> Do they have a choice?

Neither the UAE nor Saudi Arabia have extradition treaties with the United States. (On a practical level, they wouldn't be able to enforce one if they had it.)

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the exact opposite of what you think. The problem is the governments in those places, and not the private company. The private company would gladly connect everyone.

The transnational private sector is neither morally consistent nor geopolitically neutral. The transnational private sector is neither morally consistent nor geopolitically neutral. The transnational private sector is neither morally consistent nor geopolitically neutral.

So what? Very few organizations are morally consistent or geopolitically neutral. Especially in 2026 where political polarization is the norm.

Despite Meta's self serving actions here their morals are significantly better than those of Saudi Arabia or the UAE.

Post reply on HN