Live data from Hacker News

Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

alqst.org

151–160 of 512 posts

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#151
post #140

What is a “human rights account”? Another reading of this headline is “Meta blocks western propaganda…l

You can read the article, look up the names online and see for yourself.

Yep, as I described.

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#152
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Just ban the lot of them and move on. How do you define social network, though? Is Facebook a social network, even though it includes a marketplace? Is HN a social network? Is Newgrounds a social network....? Seems difficult to stomp out effectively

We can come up with a definition and refine it. Maybe something like: algorithmic content suggestions trying to maximize engagement and time on app (leave out chronological + explicit follow). Banning is not the way to go about things. India is always ban happy -> a competitive exam in a state? Take down internet in the whole state to curb cheating. Outright banning hard to deal with stuff sets a bad precedent.

You don't ban the users or the internet, you make it illegal to do shitty psyops on the public. They were making plenty of money on chronological friend feeds.

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then Meta should exit that country.

If they had a moral compass. They’ve proven time and again they don’t.

Meta should exit the US too because the US does {x} that I don't agree with. But Meta doesn't have a moral compass.

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#154
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I mean, you're commenting in text format on a web forum to strangers using pseudonyms right now. Why is that valid but the use of social media isn't?

Not really. No infinite scroll. No personalized algorithm. No insane levels of tracking. To compare this to facebook or tiktok is incredibly dishonest.

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#156
post #18

Social media companies post record earnings year after year from their ads business while increasingly proving to be harmful to society. They do the bare minimum in terms of content moderation and bots while priming the algorithms to maximize revenue. The good ol' privatized profits, socialized harm model. In a just world, would social media platforms be taxed higher on corporate revenue and how would that pan out? M…

In a just world, would social media platforms be taxed higher on corporate revenue and how would that pan out? Maybe we'll be left with small federated platforms without algorithms and ads.

Make them put big block ads across ⅓ of the screen with rotating warnings of the harms of the web site people are using, like with cigarette packs.

People hate friction online.

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#157
post #132

Remember when they told us that social media would "spread democracy" ?

It can and does. The power of social media to spread ideas and accelerate political action is why fascists took it over and co-opted it. That's why we're fed the narrative that social media is evil and needs to be regulated or banned at all costs.

Do you remember cases in which it "accelerated political action" ?

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#158

Remember when they told us that social media would "spread democracy" ?

Who told you that, the entire point was to talk to girls you lacked the courage to strike up a conversation with.

Saying ‘hi, I also like that band you have a shirt of’ was just too hard so we had to create trillion dollar monstrosities.

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#159
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m taking it as a given that any sufficiently large social network is a gigantic propaganda machine of interest to domestic and foreign nation-state actors. Entertaining the thought experiment where all the normies join the fediverse: now you’ve got a big juicy target maintained by hobbyists. When it’s Lazarus Group vs Randall, the over-worked sys admin who stood up a node in his spare time, who do you think wins? S…

>Just ban the lot of them and move on. How do you define social network, though? Is Facebook a social network, even though it includes a marketplace? Is HN a social network? Is Newgrounds a social network....? Seems difficult to stomp out effectively

Seems difficult to stomp out effectively

So just give up because something is hard? Sounds like the tech industry and its never-ending quest for low-hanging fruit.

"We've tried nothing, and we're all out of ideas."

Re: Meta blocks human rights accounts from reaching audiences in Saudi Arabia, UAE

#160
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Buddy... Are you a doctor? Are you a scientist? Why do you think that you have an inalienable right to proselytize your "health practices" on a public forum? My experience was that there wasn't nearly enough moderation on social media about Covid. The absurd amount of misinformation was the final straw that finally got me to leave Facebook and Instagram.

I see. So you employ the Ad Hominem style fallacies to attack my credibility. No thank you. Unlike you, I listen with an open mind and curiosity. It's led me to an obsession in my health practices as a nearly full-time job for about 10 years, I don't just blindly follow what I'm spoon fed by a doctor or some authority figure. And neither do I blindly call forth the label of "science" to win approval and credibility.

You're describing a crank. Avoiding cranks is a good strategy even if technically biased.
Post reply on HN