Live data from Hacker News

America's Greatest Strategic Blunder: The Imprisonment of Qian Xuesen

danieltan.weblog.lol

11–20 of 62 posts

Re: America's Greatest Strategic Blunder: The Imprisonment of Qian Xuesen

#12

[flagged]

The destruction of the research and development education pipeline in the USA that took 75 years to build because “college and women and minorities bad/Israel always good” was vying for the title only a few months ago.

Oh, that blunder is so 2025. In 2026 we brought our A game.

Re: America's Greatest Strategic Blunder: The Imprisonment of Qian Xuesen

#13
I buy it that this guy is incredibly important in the history of aerospace engineering and the weapons industry, but the article seems like it's making an overly strong claim that the trajectory of American and Chinese tech development was so affected by Qian Xuesen. There are, after all, many other people involved in both trajectories. Would Qian have been so successful in China if the economic and political incentives to listen to him had not been there? Had Qian stayed in America, is there a guarantee that the infrastructure necessary to support his doctrine on technological development would have been available?

Re: America's Greatest Strategic Blunder: The Imprisonment of Qian Xuesen

#15
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately there is too much detail here for me to write more candidly.

No worries, I don't mean to disparage your article. At least it avoids some of the most annoying LLMism I have seen, and given its length you must have put some effort into prompting, researching, or editing. Hope you will find your own voice as you write more and more.

Youtube these days is full of probably great and interesting documentaries, where people put a lot of time in, but when I hear these typical LLM narrations I can't make it more then a few seconds in, they are horrible.

Re: America's Greatest Strategic Blunder: The Imprisonment of Qian Xuesen

#18
post #4

If you wanna read an article containing essentially the same information without the pesky LLM voice: https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history/2025/december/m...

This is an incredible piece of writing, to accuse it of LLM voice borders on sacrilege

Re: America's Greatest Strategic Blunder: The Imprisonment of Qian Xuesen

#20
post #4

If you wanna read an article containing essentially the same information without the pesky LLM voice: https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history/2025/december/m...

Why would anyone spend the time to read something so long that's been generated by an LLM? The topic seems super interesting otherwise and would benefit from the real human voice. OP, can you elaborate on why you decided to go this direction?
Post reply on HN