Live data from Hacker News

GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories

twitter.com

181–190 of 359 posts

Re: GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories

#181

That's the reason I stopped installing random extensions and even themes in VS Code, they are too dangerous.

I just moved to Zed (zed.dev). Has everything I need

Except extensions.

Re: GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories

#182
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I guess they mean customer's private repos? I don't think so. It is even worse if a random developer has access to customers' private repos.

Good point. Then why in the world would a company have 3,500 repos? Do they create a repo for each employee?

I'm personally up to 400 or so

Re: GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories

#183
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I guess they mean customer's private repos? I don't think so. It is even worse if a random developer has access to customers' private repos.

Good point. Then why in the world would a company have 3,500 repos? Do they create a repo for each employee?

That is not unheard of at a large software company.

Re: GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories

#184
post #174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just moved to Zed (zed.dev). Has everything I need

I really need to find the time to properly test Zed. I'm mainly using PHP Storm and I love what it can do, especially when it comes to code discovery and auto-completion. I'm not a huge fan of having a bloated toolbox, I never use PHP Storm's included terminal or database browser. Zed was super impressive when I first started it, but I don't know yet how it compares with PHP Storm.

PHP Storm is a proper IDE, Zed is a souped-up editor.

It wont be the same experience at all, the debugging and deployment stuff will be strictly inferior and the jump to code might be less impressive.

Zed has LSP support though, so if you have a good LSP then you’ll get some nice IDE features, but they’re not really comparable.

Re: GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories

#185
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This comment reminds me of a joke where the punchline is that a person is so poor that burglars break in to their house and leave money. Similarly, I could see ransomware groups hacking in and feeling bad for GH so they improve a few things to help them get to at leave nine fives of uptime.

Just in case you are not aware, a joke loses its fun factor if you explain it.

I believe you are explaining very basic things to an LLM.

Re: GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories

#187

That's the reason I stopped installing random extensions and even themes in VS Code, they are too dangerous.

I just moved to Zed (zed.dev). Has everything I need

I installed Zed on a work machine at a well-known software company and a week later they forced me to reimage my machine because they got some alert that the app was attempting to access browser credentials :(

No shade on Zed, sometimes in-house security tools just don't like new software.

Re: GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories

#188
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just moved to Zed (zed.dev). Has everything I need

does it have some kind of sandboxing for its extensions?

The extension capability is much less powerful than VSCode (no embedded web view) so it's a lot harder to pull off crazy stuff. All of the language support is done via language servers.

Re: GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories

#189
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This comment reminds me of a joke where the punchline is that a person is so poor that burglars break in to their house and leave money. Similarly, I could see ransomware groups hacking in and feeling bad for GH so they improve a few things to help them get to at leave nine fives of uptime.

Just in case you are not aware, a joke loses its fun factor if you explain it.

On hn, a joke increases its fun factor by being over-explained in excruciating detail with several digressions into related jokes and the history and philosophy of joking, and someone ends up showing a site they made with all the possible variations of that joke and something about the scrolljacking css annoys one of the commenters enough that they break in and fix it.

Re: GitHub is investigating unauthorized access to their internal repositories

#190
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

in my org, devs don’t have access to customer data directly, and sysadmins don’t have access to modify code. It’s a simple rule from a simpler time, to limit the risk of total compromise.

Repos should not contain customer data.

Private Repos, in githubs case, might be customer data.
Post reply on HN