Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Hanoi’s humble beer glass and the memory of a nation

sundaylongread.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 48 posts

Re: Hanoi’s humble beer glass and the memory of a nation

#21

Post by Spooky23 »

dctoedt wrote: post #17

FTA: the defeat of American troops and fall of Saigon in 1975 This is a bit misleading: Yes, strategically the U.S. was defeated in 1975, but U.S. troops had pulled out in 1973, having essentially never been beaten on the battlefield — not that it matters, of course.

That’s really splitting hairs. The Republic of Vietnam was a dead man walking, but it was a United States puppet state, and they finally collapsed in 1975.

The cope stuff of “never beaten in the battlefield” is just bullshit. The point of fighting a war is to win. The military bureaucrats tried to apply kill counts as a proxy for victory.

The army pulled out but everything didn’t just end. There was a variety of covert and semi-covert American presence remaining, both in terms of CIA people and “sheep dipped” contractors.

Re: Hanoi’s humble beer glass and the memory of a nation

#22

Post by neves »

dctoedt wrote: post #17

FTA: the defeat of American troops and fall of Saigon in 1975 This is a bit misleading: Yes, strategically the U.S. was defeated in 1975, but U.S. troops had pulled out in 1973, having essentially never been beaten on the battlefield — not that it matters, of course.

Have you ever seen the videos of American fleeing Saigon?

Re: Hanoi’s humble beer glass and the memory of a nation

#25

Post by dctoedt »

neves wrote: post #22
dctoedt wrote: post #17

FTA: the defeat of American troops and fall of Saigon in 1975 This is a bit misleading: Yes, strategically the U.S. was defeated in 1975, but U.S. troops had pulled out in 1973, having essentially never been beaten on the battlefield — not that it matters, of course.

Have you ever seen the videos of American fleeing Saigon?

> Have you ever seen the videos of American fleeing Saigon?

Yes. I was a serving Navy officer at the time. My above comment stands.

Re: Hanoi’s humble beer glass and the memory of a nation

#26

Post by dctoedt »

Spooky23 wrote: post #21
dctoedt wrote: post #17

FTA: the defeat of American troops and fall of Saigon in 1975 This is a bit misleading: Yes, strategically the U.S. was defeated in 1975, but U.S. troops had pulled out in 1973, having essentially never been beaten on the battlefield — not that it matters, of course.

That’s really splitting hairs. The Republic of Vietnam was a dead man walking, but it was a United States puppet state, and they finally collapsed in 1975. The cope stuff of “never beaten in the battlefield” is just bullshit. The point of fighting a war is to win. The military bureaucrats tried to apply kill counts as a proxy for victory. The army pulled out but everything didn’t just end. There was a variety of cove…

> That’s really splitting hairs.

As software people are keenly aware, accuracy in writing is important.

> The Republic of Vietnam was a dead man walking, but it was a United States puppet state, and they finally collapsed in 1975.

I don't disagree. In hindsight, the U.S.'s political strategy was disastrous. American decisionmakers — like all of us — had to make their best judgments based on education and experience (and the often-malign influence of groupthink). Some factors were especially salient:

• As WWII ended, the "Atlanticists" in the State Department supported France's insistence on retaining their Southeast Asian colonies (IIRC, because the U.S. wanted a strong anticommunist France to help stand up to Stalin and the Red Army after Germany's surrender). Also IIRC, FDR was inclined to support Ho Chi Minh's independence movement, but he was gravely ill by then.

• The American political class was very much aware of the lessons of Munich in 1938; of Stalin's conquest of Eastern Europe in 1945; and of North Korea's invasion of South Korea in 1950. It wasn't unreasonable for them to fear the spread of totalitarian communism.

• The governing Democratic Party was acutely aware of the political impact of McCarthyism in the 1950s, including being incessantly attacked by the GOP for having "lost" China in 1949 (as if China was ours to lose).

• Douglas MacArthur's advice to President Kennedy — not to put troops on the ground in Asia — didn't carry the day. [0]

Those interested in this debacle should read David Halberstam's magisterial book The Best and the Brightest. [1]

[0] https://thediplomat.com/2018/10/a-new-take-on-general-macart...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Best_and_the_Brightest

Re: Hanoi’s humble beer glass and the memory of a nation

#27

Post by l5870uoo9y »

> Bia hơi (pronounced “bee-ah hoy” and meaning “fresh beer”) is brewed without preservatives or added carbonation.

Tank beer (tankova) from Urquell is same but it last a week or two in the tank to my knowledge and not just 24 hours as Bia hơi. It is properly the best pilsner in the world.

Re: Hanoi’s humble beer glass and the memory of a nation

#28

Post by mytailorisrich »

christkv wrote: post #11

Talking about weird cultural things. Pretty much every Spanish household has at least some of their drinking glasses made up of the glasses used by Nocilla (Spanish chocolate spread brand). https://dechocolate.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/nocilla.j...

It used to be like that in France with Maille glasses (mustard and gherkins).

Re: Hanoi’s humble beer glass and the memory of a nation

#30

Post by stryan »

ErroneousBosh wrote: post #18

> brewed it fresh daily This is not how beer works.

It's a new batch each day, but it's not drank in the same day it's brewed I suspect. Probably a week or two later, going off some quick research into "running ales", a similar English style of brewing.
Post reply on HN