Live data from Hacker News

OpenBSD 7.9

openbsd.org

201–210 of 314 posts

Re: OpenBSD 7.9

#201

The big news for some of us is that Exim has been dropped from ports. Here is a good article about transitioning from Exim to OpenSMTPD: https://nxdomain.no/~peter/time_for_opensmtpd.html I tried using OpenSMTPD a long time ago, shortly after it came out, but things were not stable enough. I guess it is time to give it another go...

Surprised exim was dropped from ports. It is not like it was ever in base. I guess the maintainer did not want to anymore.

Re: OpenBSD 7.9

#202
post #86

OpenBSD 7.9 release artwork by Lyra Henderson https://www.openbsd.org/images/PinkPuffy.png https://www.openbsd.org/images/puffy79.gif Release song is "Diamond in the Rough" - Composed & produced by Bob Kitella. https://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#79 Apparel (t-shirts, so far): https://openbsdstore.com/

> https://www.openbsd.org/images/PinkPuffy.png

> Apparel (t-shirts, so far): https://openbsdstore.com/

Interesting.

In the image you linked (PinkPuffy.png), the cat's hat says "security." In the OpenBSD store, the cat's hat reads "POLICE" on several of the shirts.

Re: OpenBSD 7.9

#203
post #31
post #10

Anyone here using OpenBSD? If so, for what purpose? I’ve always wanted to use NetBSD for an application for an embedded system / IoT device but never had the pleasure (yet!).

I use it on my personal laptop, essentially because I like how slim and simple it is. Packaging is simple, kernel development and upgrade is simple, etc. Also the kernel code itself is written in a style I like, it's to the point, no useless abstractions, no fuss. I prefer it even amongst other BSDs I tried (netbsd and free*lbsd/dragonfly). It just feels nice to be able to understand most of your system. It's not as…

> there is a sense of understanding your system that is refreshing

That's why I used to run Slackware, and then foud Alpine to be the best - much better than Void or Arch IMO. Works well as a very minimal system, and I know everything very well because of it. It's an ideal approach IMO, the best of both worlds.

Re: OpenBSD 7.9

#204
post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, not really. Linux has better options available and is significantly stronger when configured correctly. The OpenBSD approach ls largely based around eliminating bugs in the first place, but isn't as strong at limiting an attacker that successfully exploited a bug they missed or weren't responsible for.

> when configured correctly. These are the operative words. With OpenBSD, you get this out of the box and everything just works. With other operating systems, you have to do a lot of the legwork that's already been done for you with OpenBSD and make sure you didn't break things with your configuration.

> These are the operative words.

These are words that when applied equally to Linux and OpenBSD, has Linux coming out ahead.

> With OpenBSD, you get this out of the box and everything just works.

With OpenBSD, out of the box you get a blank slate that really can't do anything, that you have to configure to do what you want, and currently can't be configured to be as secure as linux can be.

Re: OpenBSD 7.9

#205
post #200

Release Engineering. Noun. See Also OpenBSD OpenBSD does a lot of things well, definitely punches above their weight. One underrated feature is their approach to releasing. No "When it's done" here. Like clockwork twice a year, they slow down, clean the shop, get their experiments in order and cook a release, a stable point in time. More projects could learn a thing or two from this.

Agreed. I also like that code doesn't get committed without a quality man page.

Re: OpenBSD 7.9

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ...I don’t have time to be a full-time Linux Sysadmin anymore. Just want the servers to run without having to think about them... Very salient comment there! And, while not the only reason for me, but what you noted is sort of one reason that's triggering the itch in me to go back to playing with the BSDs. Don't get me wrong, I still do love fiddling around with some areas of linux once in a while....but then, ther…

Yeah, time is finite and fleeting and the older I get the faster it seems to go! As a teen I had infinite time to compile Linux and debug stuff. Now I just want to spend time with family/outdoors and not be stuck in a windowless room negotiating with a black box. ;-P

Its like you're reading my mind!!! lol :-D

Re: OpenBSD 7.9

#207

The big news for some of us is that Exim has been dropped from ports. Here is a good article about transitioning from Exim to OpenSMTPD: https://nxdomain.no/~peter/time_for_opensmtpd.html I tried using OpenSMTPD a long time ago, shortly after it came out, but things were not stable enough. I guess it is time to give it another go...

OpenSMTPD was substantially rewritten in 6.4 (2018). It is the best SMTP server for the majority of use cases. Unfortunately, the portable version has been weakly supported, so it's usually only OpenBSD users than learn how great it is.

Re: OpenBSD 7.9

#208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are correct; OpenBSD is secure by default. And it's not subjective at all. The homepage of https://www.openbsd.org proudly states "Only two remote holes in the default install, in a heck of a long time!" if they didn't have the evidence to support the statement, the internet would have forced them to remove it by now. ;-) Remote (exploitable) holes are the ones we all care about.

The key (and not saying it's bad, mind you) is that the default install has very few services installed, let alone running or open. So even if Debian and OpenBSD ship the exact same web server, but Debian has it defaulted installed and on, but OpenBSD does not, then a remote exploit won't count against OpenBSD.

Isn't that a good thing for certain use cases ? If you are building an appliance type thing (say a storage or networking device) then you would want something minimalist you can add only the necessary services on. And arent those the types of devices the BSD (in general) are used for ?

Less attack surface always equals less potential for bugs/flaws/exploits regardless of how good red teaming tools and workflows get.

Now obviously for other use cases Linux could be a much better option.

Re: OpenBSD 7.9

#209
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is OpenBSD actually more secure than Linux? I have not been able to find any data to support this—only some vague opinions.

It's not meaningfully more secure than e.g. Debian. Their claim to fame ("only two remote holes in the default install in X number of years") is definitionally only valid for the default install in its default configuration which means: no httpd, no smtpd, no unbound, etc. etc. etc. The default install isn't very useful, because it doesn't do a lot, and so "only two remote holes" or whatever isn't really saying much.…

Don't most people use something FreeBSD based for production use ? I was under the impression OpenBSD was more used for testing and security research.

For personal devices I'm not sure why anyone would run a BSD in the first place

Re: OpenBSD 7.9

#210
post #86

OpenBSD 7.9 release artwork by Lyra Henderson https://www.openbsd.org/images/PinkPuffy.png https://www.openbsd.org/images/puffy79.gif Release song is "Diamond in the Rough" - Composed & produced by Bob Kitella. https://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#79 Apparel (t-shirts, so far): https://openbsdstore.com/

Interesting to see OpenBSD continuing to gain hardware support. I've been running it on a small home server for DNS/DHCP and the stability is remarkable. The man years of auditing really show.

"Interesting"

Is this an AI-generated comment

It was originally [flagged] and [dead]

Post reply on HN