Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft surprises with its first server Linux distribution: Azure Linux 4.0

zdnet.com

31–40 of 50 posts

Re: Microsoft surprises with its first server Linux distribution: Azure Linux 4.0

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Heh. > MS Linux is released under the provisions of the Gates Private License, which means you can freely use this Software on a single machine without warranty after having paid the purchase price and annual renewal fees.

It arose as a joke site from /., when and where people still had a sense of humor.

Good times. Reminds me of the following[1] classic: "What If Linus Torvalds Gets Hit By A Bus?" - An Empirical Study

[1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20150621191048/http://segfault.o...

Re: Microsoft surprises with its first server Linux distribution: Azure Linux 4.0

#32
post #26

https://gamesbymason.com/blog/2026/microsoft/ Prediction: Microsoft Is Going To Do The Funniest Thing Imaginable this guy called it loooong back

I remember a reading a similar prediction from several years ago, too, with more or less the same reasons. If I'm able to dig it up, I'll post a link. It does make complete sense, doesn't it?...

There were a bunch of jokes about Windows being the most popular Linux desktop environment when WSL was released too.

Re: Microsoft surprises with its first server Linux distribution: Azure Linux 4.0

#34
post #29
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Xenix was Microsoft's first operating system, it predates DOS. Admittedly, Microsoft did not actually write Xenix. They bought a System3 source license from AT&T and used that as a base, Their main service model was to port it to various systems. Fun Fact: Xenix was the main reason a partition table was included when the PC first got hard disk support.

They developed something called M-DOS or MIDAS in 1979, but by that time CP/M was already established, so they decided against releasing it.

This was news to me, so I went digging.

« M-DOS

    During 1977 and 1978, Microsoft adapted both BASIC and Microsoft
    FORTRAN for an increasingly popular 8-bit operating system called
    CP/M. At the end of 1978, Gates and Allen moved Microsoft from
    Albuquerque to Bellevue, Washington. The company continued to
    concentrate on programming languages, producing versions of BASIC for
    the 6502 and the TI9900.

    During this same period, Marc McDonald also worked on developing an 8-
    bit operating system called M-DOS (usually pronounced "Midas" or "My
    DOS"). Although it never became a real part of the Microsoft product
    line, M-DOS was a true multitasking operating system modeled after the
    DEC TOPS-10 operating system. M-DOS provided good performance and,
    with a more flexible FAT than that built into BASIC, had a better
    file-handling structure than the up-and-coming CP/M operating system.
    At about 30 KB, however, M-DOS was unfortunately too big for an 8-bit
    environment and so ended up being relegated to the back room. As Allen
    describes it, "Trying to do a large, full-blown operating system on
    the 8080 was a lot of work, and it took a lot of memory. The 8080
    addresses only 64 K, so with the success of CP/M, we finally concluded
    that it was best not to press on with that."
»

https://www.pcjs.org/documents/books/mspl13/msdos/encycloped...

Re: Microsoft surprises with its first server Linux distribution: Azure Linux 4.0

#35
post #30

Don't use this. Don't encourage Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

Back in 1998, that would have been a legitimate concern…

Always remember: A leopard can't change his shorts.

https://wiki.lspace.org/A_leopard_can%27t_change_his_shorts

Re: Microsoft surprises with its first server Linux distribution: Azure Linux 4.0

#37

Note that despite being named here as "Azure Linux" and being described as a "General purpose Linux OS for Azure", once you go to the product documentation it's referred to as "Microsoft Azure Linux Container Host for AKS", and the Quickstart guide is about how to deploy a Kubernetes cluster. It doesn't seem very capable of general use.

The docs aren't set to be updated until after the "official" announcement at Build in a couple weeks, but this is a good call-out. We'll see about getting this updated to clarify.

Re: Microsoft surprises with its first server Linux distribution: Azure Linux 4.0

#38

Note that despite being named here as "Azure Linux" and being described as a "General purpose Linux OS for Azure", once you go to the product documentation it's referred to as "Microsoft Azure Linux Container Host for AKS", and the Quickstart guide is about how to deploy a Kubernetes cluster. It doesn't seem very capable of general use.

To date, its only external exposure was as a container host for AKS. This announcement is about also offering it as a general-purpose OS for VMs in Azure. The public preview will come in a few weeks, at which point you'll see documentation showing how to use it in that capacity.

Source: I lead the AKS and Azure Linux PM teams at Microsoft.

Re: Microsoft surprises with its first server Linux distribution: Azure Linux 4.0

#39

https://gamesbymason.com/blog/2026/microsoft/ Prediction: Microsoft Is Going To Do The Funniest Thing Imaginable this guy called it loooong back

The logic reminds me of what happened to Edge, it became a Chromium fork. If Windows starts using Linux, and they just make a better rendition of "WINE" it could be really interesting.

People will hate me for saying this, but if in fact Microsoft rolled their own distribution, it would mean a lot of Microsoft $$$ goes into developing, maintaining and hardening the kernel, with Linus Torvalds gatekeeping the changes.

Re: Microsoft surprises with its first server Linux distribution: Azure Linux 4.0

#40
post #29
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Xenix was Microsoft's first operating system, it predates DOS. Admittedly, Microsoft did not actually write Xenix. They bought a System3 source license from AT&T and used that as a base, Their main service model was to port it to various systems. Fun Fact: Xenix was the main reason a partition table was included when the PC first got hard disk support.

They developed something called M-DOS or MIDAS in 1979, but by that time CP/M was already established, so they decided against releasing it.

I was always curious on why their original product, BASIC, did not evolve into a full operating system. Looking at it with the sensibility of a unix affectionado. basic is sort of analogous to the unix shell, a unified interactive user interface and scripting language. This would appear to be a far superior interface than the relatively crippled CP/M inspired DOS command interpreter.

My best guess, memory, on those early microcomputers that consideration trumped any user interface ergonomics and DOS(cough CP/M) used less memory than the BASIC interpreter.

Post reply on HN