31–40 of 211 posts
Focus stacking generally is not perfect process and can lead to artifacts/errors and I'd imagine those can then compound when stacked images are used for 3dgs. Also the image focus actually provides some depth data in itself that could be useful?
Dany, this is so cool. I'm wondering if the splat community has decided this paper is valuable -- https://github.com/fraunhoferhhi/Self-Organizing-Gaussians -- looking at all the detail in the strawberry splat made me wonder how small one can get the download, and what the current state of the art is for compression.
What happened to the bottom of that poor strawberry?
It was mounted at the bottom.. and I can't quite reach it with my camera. Might have to try some two pass way.
Anyway, very cool splat, fair play
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yup. It's rotten on the other side. Or maybe lead poisoned
Sorry if I fell for Poe's law, but just for clarity, the strawberry's rotten underside is most likely missing splats in the rendering.
Edit. TIL Poe's law
I read [1], but I still don't quite know what I'm looking at. My guess is a 3D model reconstructed from lots of detailed pictures? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_splatting
What I love about gaussian splats is the way they degrade - instead of a hard cutoff or LoD changing spheres into cubes etc., they get increasingly "dreamy" - the basic idea is still there, just less detailed.
Take for example this scene:
https://superspl.at/scene/e721ea7c
If you navigate closer to the trees, things around you become blurry - as if the very fabric of reality unraveled.
I read [1], but I still don't quite know what I'm looking at. My guess is a 3D model reconstructed from lots of detailed pictures? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_splatting