I'm curious how the 6 months have looked from a non-programmer's perspective. What kind of co-working tools and similar optimizations have people from other fields experienced?
Claude in Office was a tipping point for nontechnical folks around me. Everyone’s slides decks are immaculate now. Finance isn’t needing nearly as much BI help. It’s pretty impressive.
The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
101–110 of 631 posts
Re: The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
I remember this very clearly myself. Before opus 4.5, I was doing a lot of hand holding and was coding a lot myself, but I have not written code since that day more or less. I did write some stuff myself just to learn how the enigma encryption machine worked, so wrote myself to learn. But professionally, I stopped coding in November.
It is sad. I like programming, if I couldn't do it and had to write text (which I do hate, I'm not a writer) it would be make quite a sad world.
Re: The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you justify your salary given that you're just using a tool that any of us could use for $20 an hour in your role?
Please see Ben Evans’ podcast on a good take on this. Coding is just one of the task you do in your job, it is not the job or at least it probably is not. You do not get paid to code, you get paid to make a set of decisions that create value to the company. If this is automated then yes sadly your salary is not justified.
But it's by far the most fun part and the only reason to take such a job...
Re: The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because the tool will happily give you a "solution" that kinda works for a few inputs. It will happily correct itself when you give it more incorrect tests. It will almost never converge on the general solution that will pass tests you haven't given it yet. This is why AI is sooo good at Javascript and related slop. A solution that "kinda works" is good enough 9 times out of 10 and if some tests fail well ... YOLO an…
To be fair, take away a human's paren highlighting and see how well they do.
Re: The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
#105Starting from zero today, how would someone quickly get upto speed with the latest and greatest AI tooling on an extremely limited budget? Is the only choice to pay for the "max" plans? Or just read so much about it that you bs your way through an interview and then use the company's resources? Simon, I'm curious too how much you invest each month researching all the latest and great AI tech?
Re: The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
#106Spot on. Building our tool, we found AI is magic at scraping competitor data, but terrible at market validation. The 'why' is strictly human.
Re: The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
#107Starting from zero today, how would someone quickly get upto speed with the latest and greatest AI tooling on an extremely limited budget? Is the only choice to pay for the "max" plans? Or just read so much about it that you bs your way through an interview and then use the company's resources? Simon, I'm curious too how much you invest each month researching all the latest and great AI tech?
$20 chatgpt pro plan gives pretty generous usage both of codex, general chat
Re: The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
#108what are your thoughts on Software engineer replacement. My team has already seen big reductions. Q/A team is gone. Software Engineer reduced by a third. Scared for the future
Ditching the QA team when the single highest challenge is verifying that vibe-coded systems do what they're meant to is extraordinarily short-sighted. Personally, the more time I spend working with coding agents the least worried I am for my career. Getting the best results out of them is really hard . They amplify existing skills and experience, so the more experience you have the better.
I have a theory: if they were good at writing automated tests, they would have been developers instead of QA engineers.
Not saying that there aren't any high quality QA engineers, I worked with some. But LLM's raised the bar in a way that most QA engineers can't reach.
Re: The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
#109I'm curious how the 6 months have looked from a non-programmer's perspective. What kind of co-working tools and similar optimizations have people from other fields experienced?
Re: The last six months in LLMs in five minutes
#110> and there’s zero chance any AI lab would train a model for such a ridiculous task. I'm not sure that's true anymore considering how popular Simon's blog is
Simon mentions further along in his article that given Jeff Dean’s post referencing the pelican-riding-a-bike task (and how good current models are at doing it), that it’s no longer a great benchmark to use. Enter the opossum riding an e-scooter!