Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late
11–20 of 38 posts
Re: Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late
#12Re: Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late
#13There is incentive to stay quiet: getting the paycheck and a stress-free evening with my family.
Re: Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late
#14You can push back and change decisions that happen one layer above but can't do much more than that unless you want to become an activist.
You have to have trust that the higher ups are smart enough to be trusted with the decisions.
Re: Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late
#15It’s not wise to be against the direction of an executive. You will be labeled combative, misaligned, or even uncooperative. It’s not worth it. Unless you have a strong political ally, it can be career suicide in your company.
Re: Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late
#16But make no mistake: this is also a result of so many countries' piss poor work laws. I can push back against my CEO and happily do so and tell him it's a terrible idea, because the worst that happens is that he gets pissy, but I will not get fired because of it, not get fired because of putting it in writing, because firing people for that would be wrongful termination. Boeing scale fuck ups could only have happened in the US because those engineers would be fired for speaking out.
Re: Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late
#17I mostly said nothing since it seemed no one was interested.
During the contract, I wrote a doc about the shortcomings, problems, and potential solutions, adding to it whenever I ran into something. From code to management to tools used.
When my contract ended, I sent the doc to a couple of people who I felt needed to read it. They loved it, and passed it around to practically everyone. I had emails from offices all over the world with questions about it.
I didn't renew the contract since I had already moved on to other things.
If I had that time again, I would speak up, but I would do so with a well-thought-out document.
Re: Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late
#18Putting a price on the decision? This is very bold statement, there are few people on the planet who can give right predictions about the price of the decision.
Imagine engineer saying: "this will ruin our company"
CEO: "What? excuse me, how did you come to this conclusion? what analysis have you run? how did you get these numbers?"
I don't think what you are describing is easy to accomplish in practice, you made it sound simple, but complex systems don't operate this way. You have 100 departments, each can contribute 1 tiny problem and combination of them could lead to catasthropic outcome, but in isolation price feels like negligible or too small, no one can put the price on the decision
Re: Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late
#19And when such negative feedback arrives, they don't get all Colonel Kilgore from "Apocalypse Now" and decide that CHARLIE DOESN'T SURF.
Re: Nobody Pushed Back: Why Engineers Stay Silent Until It's Too Late
#20This article is written atrociously. It's geniunely unpleasant to read the basement tier slop like this. It doesn't matter if it has a salient point because this article could have been a comment.