21–30 of 373 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Speed cameras? I dont know, as long as people kill people with their vehicles, speed cameras are a tiny evil.
Speed cameras or not, what you described will always happen. I would prefer no evil instead of a tiny evil however.
"At least 25 cameras have been destroyed". Sounds like a mere drop in the bucket.
The author wants them smashed. The point of the article is to attempt to normalize and provide justification for the behavior, so that more people feel OK doing it.
Flock cameras appeal to weak communist attitudes, where there is a desire for a "good" authoritarian government that tracks everyone... for "their own good".
Why smash them when you can harvest them. I’m sure they have components that can be sold.
Better yet, dismantle them without harm and send them back with no return address. Reduces what you can be charged with, prevents Flock from getting insurance benefits, and is all the more frustrating for them to deal with. > I found this on the side of the road and thought you might want it back.
This definitely takes more effort than smashing them does.
> Reduces what you can be charged with,
Does it? How? There's not even a return address to show that a person sent the parts back to Flock instead of just disappearing it.
> prevents Flock from getting insurance benefits
How? The camera doesn't repair itself. It still takes money to turn a pile of camera parts into a working camera on some street corner somewhere.
> and is all the more frustrating for them to deal with.
Is it? Is corporate frustration the goal? (Is corporate frustration even possible?)
"At least 25 cameras have been destroyed". Sounds like a mere drop in the bucket.
The author wants them smashed. The point of the article is to attempt to normalize and provide justification for the behavior, so that more people feel OK doing it.
Why smash them when you can harvest them. I’m sure they have components that can be sold.
Better yet, dismantle them without harm and send them back with no return address. Reduces what you can be charged with, prevents Flock from getting insurance benefits, and is all the more frustrating for them to deal with. > I found this on the side of the road and thought you might want it back.
A Little Brother solution: they want data, give them so much bad data the rest of their data becomes worthless. But it only works on a mass scale.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Speed cameras or not, what you described will always happen. I would prefer no evil instead of a tiny evil however.
Likely yea, but with them at least some idiots too stupid to drive get some degree of punishment.
This website and article promote the destruction of property. If you disagree with something, you can engage civily, encourage people to vote with you, run for elections. Violence is not the answer.