181–190 of 334 posts
I understand the need for memory footprint in some situations, but what's the point of seeking performance for a software that mostly calls LLMs and waits?
Rewriting things in rust is "cool". Bun did it, other projects did it. Therefore, writing a coding agent in one should be cool too.
And apparently enough HN crowd agrees with it to take the #1 spot on the board.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Junie does not support BYOK inside the IDE
Has this position recently changed? It states this on the marketing page? > Use a JetBrains AI subscription or connect your preferred provider with Bring Your Own Key (BYOK).
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/articles/SUPPORT-A-1833/What-...
(To make it more confusing, Junie CLI seems to say it will any provider)
I understand the need for memory footprint in some situations, but what's the point of seeking performance for a software that mostly calls LLMs and waits?
After switching away from GNOME Terminal + Zsh to Ghostty + Nushell, I started to appreciate how instant everything feels. Why not make everything just as fast?
I understand the need for memory footprint in some situations, but what's the point of seeking performance for a software that mostly calls LLMs and waits?
So even if it doesn't create tangible advantage in a particular use case - its still good for the whole industry.
As you can see, writing a coding agent in a compiled language makes a ton of sense and gives the benefits of running multiple agents efficiently instead of running into leaks and tools consuming gigabytes of RAM.
I understand the need for memory footprint in some situations, but what's the point of seeking performance for a software that mostly calls LLMs and waits?
See projects such as picoclaw, nullclaw and more.
I understand the need for memory footprint in some situations, but what's the point of seeking performance for a software that mostly calls LLMs and waits?
I understand the need for memory footprint in some situations, but what's the point of seeking performance for a software that mostly calls LLMs and waits?
But seeing how slow claude code and copilot cli are and how much ram they use I'm flabbergasted. If you have long running sessions they can both take tens pf gigabytes of ram and feel quite sluggish.
I understand the need for memory footprint in some situations, but what's the point of seeking performance for a software that mostly calls LLMs and waits?