They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
nateglubish.substack.com
They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
1–10 of 74 posts
Re: They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
#2I searched this report for "test". Result: none found.
> what if a small team of public servants, equipped with modern AI development tools, built the replacement systems themselves?
Next: bridges and brain surgery.
Re: They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
#3Thankfully they added that horrible AIslop image right in the beginning of the article, so I knew instantly to not trust the author on anything.
Re: They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
#4Writing quality was distracting. Very breathey. Hard to understand if I was getting important information or not -- but it's ok, some people will defend this style.
Re: They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
#5[flagged]
Re: They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
#6[dead]
Re: They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
#7I searched this report for "test". Result: none found. > what if a small team of public servants, equipped with modern AI development tools, built the replacement systems themselves? Next: bridges and brain surgery.
On the one hand, yes.
On the other, procurement is so broken, that if their inhouse team is only marginally better, it's a win.
Re: They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
#8Great idea, and hopefully great results. But it’s written like LinkedIn “broetry” and that AI image at the top promises a fluffy article. Maybe expand a bit on some of the impressive tech described in the body?
Re: They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
#9Great idea, and hopefully great results. But it’s written like LinkedIn “broetry” and that AI image at the top promises a fluffy article. Maybe expand a bit on some of the impressive tech described in the body?
I’m at the point where if I see an AI image at the start of an article I just back right out. It would be so much better if the author just didn’t include an image at all. What did this image actually add to the content of the post? If you’re just doing something for the sake of doing it you’ve lost the plot.
Re: They Said It Would Cost $54M. We Said "No Thanks."
#10Thankfully they added that horrible AIslop image right in the beginning of the article, so I knew instantly to not trust the author on anything.
Well, Nate Glubish seems to be the Minister of Technology and Innovation of Alberta.