Live data from Hacker News

Starship V3

spacex.com

101–110 of 667 posts

Re: Starship V3

#101

[flagged]

long term is doing a lot of heavy lifting here...

in the very broad shoulders of long term, he's probably right.. its why the concept of a dysonsphere is around. you can get uninterrupted 24/7 free energy.

but yeah, the tech is a long way away.

*Edit: lol My estimate is that within 2 to 3 years, the lowest cost way to generate AI compute will be in space.

i think 2-3 years is a very unlikely outcome.

Re: Starship V3

#102

[flagged]

Honestly, I think he's spot on, and I normally am not fond of Elon's public behavior. I mentioned in another thread that they're getting around having to ask permission to build datacenters by doing it in space. The entire thing is to avoid NIMBY stuff I'd bet.

How do you cool them?

https://www.chaotropy.com/why-jeff-bezos-is-probably-wrong-p...

Re: Starship V3

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

issue is land based will still be cheaper. there are lot of cool things we can do in space, i’m not convinced putting data center is one of them.

Elon explained the logic at length in an interview: Cheaper != Available. The availability of power is the constraint almost everywhere, no matter how much money you throw at it. Gas turbine production has a many-year backlog. Everybody that can make the single-crystal superalloy turbine blades is fully booked for most of a decade and can't expand capacity for years (at least). Meanwhile, putting a slightly larger so…

What are the benefits of a solar panel in space vs a solar panel here on Earth? I get that there's less "night" up there, and there's less interference from the atmosphere so the solar is more efficient, but is it that much more efficient that it actually makes more sense than solar panels on earth?

Re: Starship V3

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You've got to give him credit though. His caustic managerial style seems to have borne fruit despite his lack of engineering or technical skills. He has been supremely effective at defining a vision(however delusional) and attracting funding. Will we get to Mars soon? Hell no. But we may end up with a world-leading launch provider based in the US and that's a clear win for the country.

Don’t buy into the 2010’s Tony stark persona. His momentum is clearly slowing because he can’t put his politics and rather fucked social values behind business sense. I have immense appreciation for what SpaceX has done for humanity. I’m not being dramatic. Reusable rockets alone is an incredible achievement . But he’s lost the plot. He needs to drop his right wing bullshit and stardom chasing if he wants to be taken…

I think it’s tough to stay grounded when you’re as rich as he is. (To be clear, my intent is to explain and not excuse the path he’s taken.)

Re: Starship V3

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

The framing was BS. "I protest being groped without consent by this one guy". "Oh, which other goateed, gold-chain wearing pervert would you rather do it?" "None" is a full, and adequate answer.

We’re talking about rockets, not politics.

Re: Starship V3

#107

[flagged]

One of the underrated topics about space right now is the potential supply of rockets outstrips demand by a lot.

We're simply out things we can profitably send to space so SpaceX and others are trying to come up with ideas to induce demand.

My understanding is that Starlink mostly grew out of the same need to justify scaling up rocket production.

Re: Starship V3

#108

[flagged]

He is talking about distributed AI, with their own AI chip, ( may be they can work at higher temperatures allow it to slowly cool to space ? ) not space station size server farm. By that, energy requirements will also be reduce, my biggest concern is, if every one starts doing it, in no time, millions of satellites will be in the space

Re: Starship V3

#109
post #20

Gotta pump that Grok IPO /s Seriously though, the whole SpaceXAI makes zero sense to me. SpaceX was a wonderful company and there was zero need to pollute it with Twitter and a service that creates sexual images of people without their consent.

I was initially very skeptical about the viability of space-based data centers but after a couple hours reading papers, studies and summary technical assessments I realized there are a range of credible expert viewpoints from, "pretty unlikely" to "it could actually work". There at least appear to be plausible, though unproven, solutions to the most obvious drive-by objections I had off the top of my non-expert head.…

Putting a datacentre in space may be feasible but the scale that he's suggesting is really unbelievable.

And if he's actually capable of producing solar panels in the quantity that he's talking about in the time frame that he's talking about -- why doesn't he just put them on earth to solve our growing climate change problems and fuel shortages?

Post reply on HN