A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
11–18 of 18 posts
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#12Now that it's known, it will be arbitraged away. The guy who discovered this should have kept it a secret ;).
4. Too many people try to take advantage of this scenario
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#13Actually. Most lotteries become good bets when the jackpots get large enough. Assuming you don't split a pot with someone else, of course. Avoid 12345, geometric progressions, etc.
Lotteries never become a good bet. However, if one wanted to waste their money, picking a number that doesn't resemble a birthday or something someone else would choose would be a good idea. On the other hand, if you won the lottery from a $2 entry, $500K would be just as good as $15m since it was all random anyway.
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#14Seems like quick cash, but it turned into a lot of work: printing 150k tickets in a way that they looked hand-filled out, pulling the winning cards, cashing them in, and plenty besides. Once enough groups got wind, the margins dwindled over the course of a few months to "not worth it".
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#15Let's not forget that it's only the expected return, i.e., the return as the number of trials goes to infinity. But, you don't have infinite money to spend, so there's a good chance you'll go broke before you win (depending on the variance). Another way of looking at it, it's a random walk with a bottom barrier --- once it hits zero, you're out of the game.
I.e. risk-of-ruin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruin_theory
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#16We had just one ticket win anything. It matched 5 of 6, and our 6th was one away from the `bonus' ball. So we won about GBP3,500. If we'd have got the bonus, it would have been 100-ish times more!
I tried to convince my fellows that we were lucky, but, instead of saving gradually for the next play, they put some of their winnings back in so they could play the 210 tickets again the following week. They won GBP10.
Actually, 211 tickets were played, because quality checks showed one has been miss-filled but naturally we didn't want to drop the erroneous one. :-)
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#17Let's not forget that it's only the expected return, i.e., the return as the number of trials goes to infinity. But, you don't have infinite money to spend, so there's a good chance you'll go broke before you win (depending on the variance). Another way of looking at it, it's a random walk with a bottom barrier --- once it hits zero, you're out of the game.
you don't have infinite money to spend, so there's a good chance you'll go broke before you win I.e. risk-of-ruin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruin_theory
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#18Actually. Most lotteries become good bets when the jackpots get large enough. Assuming you don't split a pot with someone else, of course. Avoid 12345, geometric progressions, etc.
Assuming you don't split a pot with someone else, of course. That's an assumption you can't make in a parimutuel lottery, which is the usual lottery design. Mathematician Ian Stewart, author of many good books on mathematics, gives one example of a lottery in Britain that had more than seventy winners.
That's the exact example I'm thinking of when I say avoid 12345, geometric progressions, etc. I believe that example was a simple pattern.