CPanel's Black Week: 3 New Vulnerabilities Patched After Attack on 44k Servers
1–10 of 83 posts
Re: CPanel's Black Week: 3 New Vulnerabilities Patched After Attack on 44k Servers
#2People are still using cpanel?
Re: CPanel's Black Week: 3 New Vulnerabilities Patched After Attack on 44k Servers
#3People are still using cpanel?
Most shared hosting plans use cpanel.
It's still widely used yes for a lot of smaller websites.
Re: CPanel's Black Week: 3 New Vulnerabilities Patched After Attack on 44k Servers
#4People are still using cpanel?
There are a lot of things that have been up for decades. The ROI on moving a simple PHP or static website to new hosting situation hasn’t been that compelling… though that could change. Thing is, I suspect most users of shared hosting which is Cpanel’s bread and butter are not reading the latest cybersecurity news.
Re: CPanel's Black Week: 3 New Vulnerabilities Patched After Attack on 44k Servers
#5CPanel and hosters who use them are in big trouble now; there are millions of servers running them, many of them for decades. Their clients can run code as an user without much sandboxing/guardrails at all.
Re: CPanel's Black Week: 3 New Vulnerabilities Patched After Attack on 44k Servers
#6People are still using cpanel?
CPanel on shared hosting running WordPress PHP is literally half of the entire internet still.
Re: CPanel's Black Week: 3 New Vulnerabilities Patched After Attack on 44k Servers
#7Ages ago I used php-nuke to manage my forum and it got hacked and I thought it would get taken seriously
Seeing these CPanel hacks remind me how old these codebases are and how much more vulnerability remain
Re: CPanel's Black Week: 3 New Vulnerabilities Patched After Attack on 44k Servers
#8Re: CPanel's Black Week: 3 New Vulnerabilities Patched After Attack on 44k Servers
#9Ages ago I used php-nuke to manage my forum and it got hacked and I thought it would get taken seriously Seeing these CPanel hacks remind me how old these codebases are and how much more vulnerability remain
I don't agree that "old" necessarily implies vulnerability.