[flagged]
We have so much scientific work to do.
21–30 of 61 posts
[flagged]
We have so much scientific work to do.
Tl;dr lightings may be caused by electrons/positrons from outer space hitting a cloud and initiating an "avalanche" of electrons.
There hasn’t been an increase in background cosmic rays, so likely the mechanism for lightning generation is likely a continuum in different scenarios. Cosmic rays are one, but not all.
So, nothing new? The cosmic ray hypothesis has been dominant for a few years now. This magazine…
> So, nothing new? > The cosmic ray hypothesis has been dominant for a few years now. > This magazine… I think saying "This magazine…" as if the flaws of Quanta are well understood and agreed may need additional elaboration. If you mean that experts have known this—well, the role of Quanta is to disseminate and explain expert research to scientifically literate non-experts; it is not meant to be distributing the late…
That 7 second video of a small rocket shot into a cloud to induce a lightning strike (about half way down the article) is incredible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BJIiX9_c_M Any ideas why the lightning strike appears mostly green (and momentarily purple and orange)?
[flagged]
[flagged]
Tl;dr lightings may be caused by electrons/positrons from outer space hitting a cloud and initiating an "avalanche" of electrons.
Cosmic rays are mostly protons, not electrons or positrons. You're mixing up to separate theories in the article.
[flagged]
Never mind this kind of lightning, it gets really interesting when we start to look at ball lightning, which is very real but rarely sighted.