My only question is, why release on a Friday? “News dump day” Or is that only late on Friday?
This doesn't seem like market-moving material, but maybe it's just status quo.
331–340 of 615 posts
My only question is, why release on a Friday? “News dump day” Or is that only late on Friday?
This doesn't seem like market-moving material, but maybe it's just status quo.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It makes more sense when you realize the whole point is to distract from the continued failure to release the Epstein files.
or distact from the Iran war, or distract from Israel, or distract from corruption... distraction from distractions. We keep buying what they're selling, and then complain the milk is still sour.
A lot of people still look to the MSM to define reality for them.
But there's a huge and myserious disconnect between the MSM's reporting of Trump as a Serious Person, and the reality that he's a compulsive liar and fantasist and is seriously ill with advancing dementia.
Without honest reporting, "we" don't have a public voice.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
You mean [this]( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_2021_Kabul_drone_strike ) one where the US killed an aid worker and some children in Kabul?
As for US firing missiles at children, that Tomahawk hitting the all girls school had a strike package on record which would detail its intended target.
For anyone else who has a UFO-crazy uncle, I've found Mick West's YouTube channel to be invaluable https://www.youtube.com/c/mickwest . Mick is a retired video game programmer (Spider Man, Guitar Hero, Tony Hawk), who does extremely well-researched videos analyzing UFO claims. He's not flashy or trying to be entertaining, just thorough, evidence-based and scientifically rigorous. He'll even do controlled experiments,…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or as one late-night host put it: "The Trump Files, featuring Jeffrey Epstein."
Kimmel does the Trump-Epstein Files (TM), but as we've been repeatedly told, he's not funny and has abysmal ratings and should be fired. He's so bad, he's put his entire parent company's broadcast license up for review. You realize how bad you must be for that to happen?
The War Department has unlimited access to LLMs and compute, but these are delivered as unlabeled files that one must download individually. That's ridiculous.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kimmel does the Trump-Epstein Files (TM), but as we've been repeatedly told, he's not funny and has abysmal ratings and should be fired. He's so bad, he's put his entire parent company's broadcast license up for review. You realize how bad you must be for that to happen?
I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or one of the cultists. Great job if it’s the former.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
you mean like Harvard professors claiming that a rock from interstellar space is a probe from an intelligent society?
I'm only aware of Avi Loeb, who AFAIK is generally considered a crackpot and a grifter within academia, and his claims about Oumuamua and aliens aren't taken seriously by the mainstream. Who are the others?
While I don't understand it myself, I've seen a study showing how some scientists can compartmentalize and apply different standards of evidence between their professional life and personal beliefs. In other cases, scientists conducting rigorous lab controlled studies have been deceived by fake psychics doing simple magic tricks (and not nearly as well as a competent magician). For example, Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ at Stanford Research Institute being fooled by Uri Geller. While Puthoff and Targ were trained experimentalists having worked in laser physics, their parapsychology study designs had poor controls and lacked statistical rigor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parapsychology_research_at_SRI
As a long-time skeptic, I've learned to avoid broad appeals to authority because relying on "a scientist said..." is ineffective when a true believer can cite a credentialed scientist spouting nutty stuff. In recent years the situation around military assessments of UFO sightings has also changed dramatically. In the mid-2010s, some UFO enthusiasts already in the military managed to work their way into positions as UAP investigators, largely because "UFO Investigator" was a role no serious military careerist wanted on their record. Suddenly, what were once hundred page dry, technical assessments boiling down to "inconclusive" (which no one cared about) became artfully crafted, overly-credulous reports highlighting sensational (but poorly supported) "possibilities." This coincided with a political recalculation from some members of both parties in congress and the White House during the past two administrations to stop fighting the tiny but highly vocal UFO community as it was a no-win battle and instead basically leverage UAPs as a sideshow either for attention or distraction. And it's working.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aestheticization_of_politics
[flagged]
He's not hiding any of it. Masquerade is a bit rich.