Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lately it feels like it's possible. Freshers in their first job are now capable of taking ownership and shipping full stack features in a few weeks. The feedback loop is definitely shortened - noone appreciates the years spent "googling and looking at stackoverflow" anymore, and frankly, they shouldn't be. Experience matters now mostly at the architecture, and decision-making levels, not at implementation.
I was reviewing some code done by a junior hire at my company last week, and it certainly didn't look like he was cramming 25 years into 2. It looked like he had no understanding of anything he had generated, because it was garbage. Meanwhile this week I've just reviewed the largest single PR I've ever seen, from a senior dev who disclosed it was mostly generated and cleaned up by him, and the code was perfectly fine…
Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
591–600 of 1001 posts
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#592Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#593Earlier quoted context omitted.
The future, for those who have the capital. The rest may die, shareholders don't care.
Then we must build our own future. One where we deny the capitalists access to their own automated killer robot armies.
Sure. How many of those hated capitalists have started with exactly same thought?
People should stop drop this naive act.
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#594Earlier quoted context omitted.
How exactly would you ask this in an interview setting? I'm baffled by the idea.
"Why is this role open"? Either they will answer directly with something solid like "We're growing the team" or they will evade it which is still a meaningful answer for you. You could probe further with questions like: "How has the team's headcount changed over the last 18-24 months?" Basically you're alluding to 'employee turnover' without saying it.
“It didn’t change” and it would not be telling much. They are just hiring and firing X amount of people every year.
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#595> Matthew has personally sent out every offer letter we've extended. It is a practice he has always looked forward to because it represented our growth and the incredible talent joining our mission Who gives a shit if you treat your staff like this? I will add cloudflare to the list of companies that I’ll never work for. Shame, because it seemed like an interesting place
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#596This is awkward. Exhibit A - September 2025 - "Help build the future" - Cloudflare hires 1111 interns to "help build the future" [ https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-1111-intern-program/ ] Exhibit B - May 2026 - "Building for the future" - Cloudflare lays off 1100 people, about 20% of their workforce to "continue building the future" [ https://blog.cloudflare.com/building-for-the-future/ ] I'll finish on this quo…
I’ve seen managers hiring people with an intent to lay them off when winds change to protect themselves and their close circle. I can only imagine they’ve had great KPIs in both cases: first for scaling the team, and then for cutting costs.
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#597Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then we must build our own future. One where we deny the capitalists access to their own automated killer robot armies.
>Then we must build our own future. Sure. How many of those hated capitalists have started with exactly same thought? People should stop drop this naive act.
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#598Earlier quoted context omitted.
Only if you're dumb enough to leave a paper trail showing that's what you did.
It seems it would be easy to show a pattern.
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#599Earlier quoted context omitted.
How exactly would you ask this in an interview setting? I'm baffled by the idea.
> How exactly would you ask this in an interview setting? You now know which companies do this. Every company laying off now has to wear a Scarlett Letter: "we're a layoffs company".
Just Apple (and even there only "mostly") among big tech?
Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce
#600This is awkward. Exhibit A - September 2025 - "Help build the future" - Cloudflare hires 1111 interns to "help build the future" [ https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-1111-intern-program/ ] Exhibit B - May 2026 - "Building for the future" - Cloudflare lays off 1100 people, about 20% of their workforce to "continue building the future" [ https://blog.cloudflare.com/building-for-the-future/ ] I'll finish on this quo…
This (from the September 2025 post) now evokes the Curb theme: > Like you, we have seen numerous reports that more and more firms are capping their total headcount in favor of leaning on more AI tools, leading to downsizing their intern and new-graduate hiring. This is resulting in increased sidelining of new college graduates. But we think this misreads the moment completely, so we’re heading in the opposite directi…
This is the predominant (public) talking point. And it’s true.
But along with that: when you have effective people becoming even more effective with AI, it becomes glaringly obvious who the INeffective people are. At which point it becomes hard to justify keeping those people around.
(That often includes people who are otherwise effective but aren’t utilizing agents and are therefore losing their edge.)