Live data from Hacker News

Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

reuters.com

211–220 of 1001 posts

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#211
post #135

This is awkward. Exhibit A - September 2025 - "Help build the future" - Cloudflare hires 1111 interns to "help build the future" [ https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-1111-intern-program/ ] Exhibit B - May 2026 - "Building for the future" - Cloudflare lays off 1100 people, about 20% of their workforce to "continue building the future" [ https://blog.cloudflare.com/building-for-the-future/ ] I'll finish on this quo…

Those 11 damn lucky interns!

The 1%!

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#212
If you were impacted Magnetic (AI Tax Prep for CPA firms) is hiring senior - staff level engineers in SF https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/magnetic

I interviewed at cloudflare in ~2020 and didn’t get the job - everyone I met during the process seemed really smart and kind though. Would love to work with some of those people

Email me subject “cloudflare” if interested - thomas@ our domain (I am the cofounder)

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those 11 damn lucky interns!

The 1%!

100x-ing with claude. Code not outcomes, but still!

Serious note you dont really hire interns. They are a contractor (and hopefully apprentice who is looked after) really.

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#217
post #14

I dislike the title because it doesn't clearly state it's a layoff. "Building for the future" gave me the impression that it's about some major new initiative with a roadmap outlining plans.

> "Building for the future" gave me the impression that it's about some major new initiative... If you'll believe them, it indeed is: ... [the Leadership at Cloudflare] have to be intentional in how we architect our company for the agentic AI era ... reimagining every internal process, team, and role across the company. ... [This layoff is] not a cost-cutting exercise ... [but] Cloudflare defining how a world-class,…

They're architecting their company for an agentic future? They're reimaginging the definition of a world-class, high-growth company? They're not resting on the workflows that worked yesterday? blegh

What the hell does any of that actually mean? Like in real life words? Because that much corporate bullshit really sounds like it is a cost-cutting exercise.

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#218

I interviewed there over a month ago and they ghosted me after 3 good rounds. I dodged a bullet it seems.

I interviewed, they didn't want to allow remote, requiring me to immovable move to Dallas. The rest of the team was in 5 other cities.

I'd have to move to sit in an office to jump on a Zoom.

...

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#219

There was an recent article on X with an interesting take - it could be that companies are doing layoffs not because AI is making them more productive but because it hasn't . Their costs have gone up paying for expensive AI but haven't seen any revenue benefits to offset it. Article https://x.com/championswimmer/status/2051807284691612099

This genuinely wouldn't surprise me, and I need to go back to looking at balance sheets to see if I can sus out the validity of that narrative. As AI subsidization ends prematurely and costs skyrocket, we should expect to see those costs reflected in the operation statements of major customers. Since I had Coinbase up for review already, I decided to peek there first for any sort of correlation. In 2023, their "Techn…

And to factor in other infrastructure costs that's become more expensive too, such as hosting or hardware. So unless you can isolate AI spending from others that's not going to be convincing.

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#220
post #197

Prince is claiming they laid off very few SWEs, I know at least an entire team of SWEs. https://x.com/eastdakota/status/2052560831909433554?s=20

The sre team I was hired onto last month, just lost 2 of ~12.

Cynically: our team hired two (me, senior, and a junior) and then we lost two (staff, guy who had been around since the founding, and a senior+ guy)... I kinda assume they baked in some of the layoff decisions into their past quarter or two of hiring to reduce seniority, and salaries, overall. Really short-sighted.

I was still needing to get some 1:1s scheduled with the guy who'd been here for Forever and knew which closets had all the skeletons stashed away. Can't do that now.

Post reply on HN