Live data from Hacker News

Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

reuters.com

81–90 of 1001 posts

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#81
> Cloudflare’s usage of AI has increased by more than 600% in the last three months alone.

It seems only costs increased. If productivity had increased along with the AI costs they wouldn't need to layoff.

Of couse, this is all bullshit. Making a vague gesture at AI makes it sound like the layoffs are positive.

Truth is this is simply cost cutting. Either due to overhiring in the past, or bracing for the likely economic downturn.

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#82
post #50

The message to every Cloudflare employee is clear: you'll be there for the company when times are hard. But the company will not be there for you when times are hard. It does not matter if the way we work has changed, or AI adoption has increased, or aliens show up. This is a demonstrated lack of loyalty that would result in immediate termination of the situation were reversed. The important take away for everyone el…

You only have to be there for the company in that you do work for them and they give you money in return. Any tech guys working for them will have received plenty of money. I feel sorry for the non-tech people though (HR, recruiters, etc.).

This announcement is bullshit though. Banging on about transparency and then not even trying to give a reason. They didn't even try to say it's because of AI! They just say "AI is important. We're laying off 1000 people." Wtf.

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#83
post #8

When you announce 639m USD revenue for q1 Then lay off a thousand people because you love the smell of your ai farts.

Thousand people cost 60m USD of quarterly _profit_ though (not even revenue)

That’s not how accounting works.

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#84
post #14

I dislike the title because it doesn't clearly state it's a layoff. "Building for the future" gave me the impression that it's about some major new initiative with a roadmap outlining plans.

The title should be something like "Cloudflare reducing workforce by more than 1,100 employees globally".

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#85
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally, I think AI is just a convenient scapegoat for these mass layoffs. Also, these kinds of announcements contribute to sustaining the AI hype which all tech investors benefit from. And investors looove hearing about mass layoffs, stock goes up every time without fail.

cloudflare stock went down, genius investors are not some nefarious monolith cheering for companies to make decisions based on how it benefits The Vibes. they're analysts assessing business decisions.

Wtf are you talking about? Investors are just gamblers with a fancier title.

They absolutely invest based on vibes.

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#87
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally, I think AI is just a convenient scapegoat for these mass layoffs. Also, these kinds of announcements contribute to sustaining the AI hype which all tech investors benefit from. And investors looove hearing about mass layoffs, stock goes up every time without fail.

cloudflare stock went down, genius investors are not some nefarious monolith cheering for companies to make decisions based on how it benefits The Vibes. they're analysts assessing business decisions.

It went down on poor earnings call. Layoffs were probably an attempt to soften the blow. Hard to tell what was the effect, because the two happened simultaneously

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#88
post #14

I dislike the title because it doesn't clearly state it's a layoff. "Building for the future" gave me the impression that it's about some major new initiative with a roadmap outlining plans.

Maybe I've become cynical and jaded, because when I saw the title I immediately thought to myself "oh, Cloudflare's announcing a layoff."

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

cloudflare stock went down, genius investors are not some nefarious monolith cheering for companies to make decisions based on how it benefits The Vibes. they're analysts assessing business decisions.

Wtf are you talking about? Investors are just gamblers with a fancier title. They absolutely invest based on vibes.

then why did the riveting stock analysis above mis-predict the market?

Re: Cloudflare to cut about 20% of its workforce

#90
post #69

"We are our own most demanding customer. Cloudflare’s usage of AI has increased by more than 600% in the last three months alone. Employees across the company from engineering to HR to finance to marketing run thousands of AI agent sessions each day to get their work done. That means we have to be intentional in how we architect our company for the agentic AI era in order to supercharge the value we deliver to our cu…

Which part of that sentence was confusing? I found it perfectly clear. Their internal AI use is exploding, which is a signal that they need to structure for that, and so they’re laying people off as one of the first steps towards actioning that signal.

Nowhere did they indicate there is less work to do, in fact quite the opposite.

Post reply on HN