Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd say it's a malefactor of: 1. Amazing, you just tweaked 1% efficiency 2. You idiot, you just spent an hour trying to trouble shoot a hallucinated api. On average, it's really hard to tell which ones going to win here.
Its not hard to tell at all, just look at how much it costs to run a 10T param model (especially with parallelized agents). Those costs are not worth the occasional slot machine-eque jackpot you get. For an entity like Google it might be worth it, but that's it. They definitely aren't going to let us use these things for cost they are now for much longer. Imagine going back to 2020 and tell people in 6 years going to…
AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields
51–60 of 159 posts
Re: AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields
#52Are Googlers themselves happy using Gemini coding agent instead of Claude Code or Codex? (no snark, I'm really asking)
If you mean specifically the Gemini VS Code Extension: it's terrible compared to Claude Code or Codex. I don't know how they can get away with it. Just constant timeouts, weird failure modes, have to start a new chat to switch modes... but I don't think any of that is specific to gemini the model- it seems to be the extension. As for actual solutions to problems ignoring the VS Code extension aspect, I find all three…
I'd say I'm surprised by it, but uh
Re: AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not in the next decade. Won't get funded.
Private investment in the US has grown from 100 billion in 2024 to almost 300 billion USD in 2025 [0]. Add public investments worldwide and private investments in at least China and Europe. I'm pretty sure money is not going to be the blocker. [0] https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report
Re: AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields
#54It often feels like they do not want me to develop applications for corporate clients using their Vertex API. It is just such a shame, given that their models were so great for document analysis etc.
Re: AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields
#55-2021-2024 was Denial
-2024-2025 was Anger and Bargaining
-2026 seems to be some combo of anger, bargaining and acceptance depending mostly on your class/age
Re: AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not in the next decade. Won't get funded.
Private investment in the US has grown from 100 billion in 2024 to almost 300 billion USD in 2025 [0]. Add public investments worldwide and private investments in at least China and Europe. I'm pretty sure money is not going to be the blocker. [0] https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report
Re: AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Private investment in the US has grown from 100 billion in 2024 to almost 300 billion USD in 2025 [0]. Add public investments worldwide and private investments in at least China and Europe. I'm pretty sure money is not going to be the blocker. [0] https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2026-ai-index-report
The money will go to LLMs.
Re: AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields
#58How do I access AlphaEvolve?
Re: AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields
#59This reminds me of Antirez's "Don't fall into the anti-AI hype" [0] In a sentence: These foundation models are really good at optimizing these extremely high level, extremely well defined problem spaces (ie multiply matrices faster). In Antirez's case, it's "make Redis faster". There have been two reactions: "Oh it would never work for me" and "I have seen months of my life accomplished in an hour", and I think they'…
>I think the rest of us should rest easy knowing that LLM's can't (and maybe were never meant to) tackle the tacit-knowledge-filled, human-system-centric, ambiguously-defined-problem-space jobs most mortals work I don't believe that anymore, to be honest. Models are starting to get good at ambiguity. Claude Code now asks me when something is ambiguous. Soon, all meetings will be recorded, transcribed and stored in a…
We were doing that over at Vowel a few years back, unfortunately it didn't pan out because you're competing directly against Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, etc. They are all (slowly) catching up to where we were as a scrappy startup 4 years ago.
It was truly game-changing to have all of your meetings in an easily searchable database. Even as a human.
Re: AlphaEvolve: Gemini-powered coding agent scaling impact across fields
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think the rest of us should rest easy knowing that LLM's can't [...] What if (when?) (AI-assisted) research moves AI beyond LLMs? Do you think that can't happen?
Not in the next decade. Won't get funded.
LeCun argues that most human reasoning is grounded in the physical world, not language, and that AI world models are necessary to develop true human-level intelligence. “The idea that you’re going to extend the capabilities of LLMs [large language models] to the point that they’re going to have human-level intelligence is complete nonsense,” he said. [0]
[0] https://www.wired.com/story/yann-lecun-raises-dollar1-billio...