Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
11–20 of 98 posts
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#12Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#13Honestly the experience looks pretty nice. Which is crazy to say for such an old style of program but I kind of like it. Perhaps just nostalgia for a time I never got your experience.
I'm not mad at this at all. It probably runs with like 20kb if RAM. I realize the author is probably just having fun, but if a few modern features added to this and I would probably try it. Multi cursor, a little terminal window, some way to do code hints or intelligence. This would be a dream boat lol
I started this just for the lulz, but now I've got:
copy/paste/undo
multiple cursors
debuggers
syntax highlighting (even nested languages with jetbrains style comments!)
find-in-files
integrated documentation
integrated git client (roughly modeled after lazygit)
spell checking
and tons more that I can't even remember
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#14Cool! I assume TRUST stands for "Turbo Rust"? If yes, maybe it would be worth mentioning that in the readme. I doubt that Embarcadero Technologies (the current owners of the Delphi and C++ Builder IDEs, and probably also the owners of other former Borland trademarks) would mind - but then again, it doesn't hurt to stay on the safe side...
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#15Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not mad at this at all. It probably runs with like 20kb if RAM. I realize the author is probably just having fun, but if a few modern features added to this and I would probably try it. Multi cursor, a little terminal window, some way to do code hints or intelligence. This would be a dream boat lol
https://github.com/boxed/TurboKod I started this just for the lulz, but now I've got: copy/paste/undo multiple cursors debuggers syntax highlighting (even nested languages with jetbrains style comments!) find-in-files integrated documentation integrated git client (roughly modeled after lazygit) spell checking and tons more that I can't even remember
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://github.com/boxed/TurboKod I started this just for the lulz, but now I've got: copy/paste/undo multiple cursors debuggers syntax highlighting (even nested languages with jetbrains style comments!) find-in-files integrated documentation integrated git client (roughly modeled after lazygit) spell checking and tons more that I can't even remember
It's pretty awesome and inspires me more than lulz. Highly successful art project if you ask me
I'm thinking it could be a sort of reference implementation to build your own custom IDE the way you like it. I'm going to attempt to get TurboKod to be good enough to be my daily driver, we'll see how it goes.
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#18https://ia801901.us.archive.org/5/items/TurboPascal55/Antiqu...
> Fast! Compiles 34, 000 lines of code per minute
https://archive.org/details/bitsavers_borlandtur5.5Brochure1...
Measured on a a IBM PS/2 Model 60, meaning an Intel 80286 running at 10 MHz with 640 KB for MS-DOS, up to 8 MB depending on extenders and HMA configurations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_PS/2_Model_60
And if you feel using the language complexity excuse for 2026 hardware, see OCaml, Delphi, D, or C# AOT.
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#19Rust is notorious for its slow compile times, while Turbo Pascal was known to be blazingly fast. And the debugger, one of the most important part of the experience is "Not implemented". Dressing it as a 1989 IDE makes me painfully aware of what we have lost. Despite running on hardware that were orders of magnitudes slower than today, software used to be more responsive.
By "more responsive" I mean that while modern systems are excellent at batch processing, latency is often not great, and because so much happens in parallel, also confusing.
Re: Show HN: TRUST – Coding Rust like it's 1989
#20Looking at this makes me nostalgic in a way the author probably hasn't intended. Rust is notorious for its slow compile times, while Turbo Pascal was known to be blazingly fast. And the debugger, one of the most important part of the experience is "Not implemented". Dressing it as a 1989 IDE makes me painfully aware of what we have lost. Despite running on hardware that were orders of magnitudes slower than today, so…
I will see about the debugger.