Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did Google outbid Elon for team A? Or A team just don't like Elon?
It's an internal jokes since very few high profile Deepmind engineers accepted his offer despite some serious cash being thrown at them. Meta engineers on the other hand, couldn't wait to jump ship. But that only reinforces the B team theory.
Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
291–300 of 519 posts
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#292Earlier quoted context omitted.
> funded by Middle East non-democratic governments What's the problem here exactly? Are you insinuating any non-democratic government is bad and evil and only democratic governments are the correct and right way to govern? sort of like: "there is only one true prophet, and it's the one I follow, and all the others are false!"
Yes, especially in the context of supporting US imperialism and capitalists interests (perpetual war + extraction machine) over what would actually benefit Americans: peace + cooperation initiatives. Something also tells me that American civilians would rather cooperate with peaceful governments than those that feed the blood machine. America could do so much to compel the world to work in from a human rights perspec…
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#293Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the reasons I refuse to use xAI’s models is because of the outsized negative environmental impacts of the methane gas turbines. Now I have to avoid Claude too.
You realize natural gas is one of the more environmentally friendly methods of generating power. Lots of work went into moving to natural gas generation to improve the environmental impact for electricity generation. This is nothing like burning coal.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#294Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is the same lifetime as a starlink sat
So what exactly is the benefit of having that thing in orbit then, where it costs you millions of dollars to put it there?
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#295Earlier quoted context omitted.
I see it more of lets make money off the hardware we are not using anymore. From Elon on X: ... After that, I was ok leasing Colossus 1 to Anthropic, as SpaceXAI had already moved training to Colossus 2. https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2052069691372478511
But like... most companies are so short of GPUs they'd run it on anything. SpaceXAI not needing the compute is not really a good sign imo.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't say he's failing at everything - SpaceX certainly seems a huge success. Telsa had been doing well, although sales are now declining fast, and the Cybertruck has been a failure. He massively overpaid for Twitter, ruined the site, then got X.ai to bail him out. X.ai seems like a failure - evidentially not enough demand to utilize the data center he built for it, and when have you seen anyone say they use Grok…
He's a big gambler with some judgement. But being a big gambler by definition means you will not always get it right.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#297Limits were the last straw that made me cancel my subscription and make my workflow completely model agnostic with pi. While this is good news, I'm not coming back. Anthropic just lost me with too many wrongs in too short of a time period. Opus has been replaced with GPT 5.5, DeepSeek, Kimi, Qwen and they all allow me to use my own, single harness and switch models easily if any of them start treating me the same.
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the reasons I refuse to use xAI’s models is because of the outsized negative environmental impacts of the methane gas turbines. Now I have to avoid Claude too.
If you can make up an inconsequential arbitrary rationalization to not use a service then I’m sure you can do the opposite to convince yourself to use it. That’s what virtue signaling is I guess - the action you’re taking is pointless, the only point is to tell everyone you’re taking it therefore feed the narrative forward? The entire economy runs off gas turbines though this is the thing you boycott?
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#299Earlier quoted context omitted.
Orbital DCs is blocked on starship because they _arent_ doing starlink sized satellites.
You're not going to fit a data center in a Starship either, unless you are talking a Tiny Corp Exabox "data center in a shipping container" sized one. Even something that small (1MW) would still need 4x the solar capacity of the ISS, and therefore likely some assembly required. Then you've got latency from satellite to satellite ... In any case, it appears that Musk can't even generate enough AI demand to utilize his…
Re: Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX
#300Earlier quoted context omitted.
Plot twist but makes perfect sense for both companies. Anthropic gets the compute they so desperately need to keep growing. Elon rents out compute that xAI couldn't make use of due to little demand for Grok. SpaceX gets revenue on the books for IPO. PS. I want to translate this part: We’re very intentional about where we’ll add capacity—partnering with democratic countries whose legal and regulatory frameworks suppor…
> funded by Middle East non-democratic governments What's the problem here exactly? Are you insinuating any non-democratic government is bad and evil and only democratic governments are the correct and right way to govern? sort of like: "there is only one true prophet, and it's the one I follow, and all the others are false!"
But assuming there are people that care, if a government doesn't derive its right to govern from the will of the people it governs, under what definitions can it be considered legitimate? Divine right of kings?