A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com
A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#2Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#3Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#4Avoid 12345, geometric progressions, etc.
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#5Actually. Most lotteries become good bets when the jackpots get large enough. Assuming you don't split a pot with someone else, of course. Avoid 12345, geometric progressions, etc.
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#6Actually. Most lotteries become good bets when the jackpots get large enough. Assuming you don't split a pot with someone else, of course. Avoid 12345, geometric progressions, etc.
That's an assumption you can't make in a parimutuel lottery, which is the usual lottery design. Mathematician Ian Stewart, author of many good books on mathematics, gives one example of a lottery in Britain that had more than seventy winners.
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#7Actually. Most lotteries become good bets when the jackpots get large enough. Assuming you don't split a pot with someone else, of course. Avoid 12345, geometric progressions, etc.
Why would you avoid 12345 and geometric progressions?
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#8MAA: Math Horizons ran an article on it February 2007.
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would you avoid 12345 and geometric progressions?
I assume it's because more people will have those numbers than other numbers so the pot will be split.
Re: A Lottery for People Who Are Good at Math
#10Actually. Most lotteries become good bets when the jackpots get large enough. Assuming you don't split a pot with someone else, of course. Avoid 12345, geometric progressions, etc.