How are people stopping bots reliably?
You may be able to make it more expensive than your information is worth, but of course that affects users too.
41–50 of 467 posts
How are people stopping bots reliably?
You may be able to make it more expensive than your information is worth, but of course that affects users too.
The requirements for the mobile devices are listed here: https://support.google.com/recaptcha/answer/16609652 So it seems that you will need a modern Android device with Google Play Services installed or a modern iPhone/iPad to be allowed to browse the web in the future. No mention of device integrity verification yet, but the writing is on the wall.
I've been saying for years that it does not make sense to browse the web on a smartphone. Eventually things will get bad enough that people will agree with me.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bluetooth is generally used to prove that the two devices are co-located, which makes it more complex to do your proposed kind of deployment at-scale. Bespoke solutions could perhaps work around for some smaller number of devices, this QR code layer by itself isn't intended to stop 100% of workarounds.
No browser supports Bluetooth.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which would be meaningful if phones weren't remotely controllable. So the net effect is every AI agent will also have and connect to a physical phone.
The attestation will include a unique ID of the phone, so that if you get banned you have to keep buying new phones and keep paying money to Google. Google won't stop this because it makes them money. And the official Google OS just won't feature remote-control software.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
... You... think... it would be a good thing. Don't you...
I do. It has downsides of course, but what's the alternative at this point?